Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 281 - 290 of 1433 for owen.

[PDF] NOTICE
program, administered by the Department of Corrections. See WIS. STAT. § 302.05; State v. Owens, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47459 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Daniel L. Garrity
erroneous. State v. Owens, 148 Wis.2d 922, 929-30, 436 N.W.2d 869, 872 (1989). We address first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9397 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Charles T. Wagner v. Madison Board of Police and Fire Commissioners
because we lack jurisdiction to do so. 2 Owens v. Board of Police & Fire Comm’rs of the City of Beloit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3272 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of that discretion. State v. Owens, 2006 WI App 75, ¶7, 291 Wis. 2d 229, 713 N.W.2d 187. We will affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173393 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of circuit court discretion. See State v. Owens, 2006 WI App 75, ¶¶5-7, 291 Wis. 2d 229, 713 N.W.2d 187
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195592 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lawrence S. Bundy v. University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
schedule. Schnack claimed that Tatge v. Chambers & Owen, Inc., 219 Wis. 2d 99, 579 N.W.2d 217 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16198 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
period converted to extended supervision.” State v. Owens, 2006 WI App 75, ¶5, 291 Wis. 2d 229, 713 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56505 - 2010-11-08

State v. Nathan T. Moore
. Wangelin, 221 Wis. 2d 659, 665, 586 N.W.2d 1 (Ct. App. 1998). In State v. Owens, 148 Wis. 2d 922, 436 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
] will have his or her remaining confinement period converted to extended supervision.” State v. Owens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56505 - 2014-09-15

John C. Theama v. Police and Fire Commission of the Village of Sturtevant
is “final and conclusive” and this court may not review the just cause determinations. See Owens v. Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12805 - 2005-03-31