Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 281 - 290 of 1421 for owen's.

[PDF] Lawrence S. Bundy v. University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
schedule. Schnack claimed that Tatge v. Chambers & Owen, Inc., 219 Wis. 2d 99, 579 N.W.2d 217 (1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16198 - 2017-09-21

State v. Nathan T. Moore
. Wangelin, 221 Wis. 2d 659, 665, 586 N.W.2d 1 (Ct. App. 1998). In State v. Owens, 148 Wis. 2d 922, 436 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7447 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
] will have his or her remaining confinement period converted to extended supervision.” State v. Owens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56505 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
period converted to extended supervision.” State v. Owens, 2006 WI App 75, ¶5, 291 Wis. 2d 229, 713 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56505 - 2010-11-08

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Owens, 2016 WI App 2, ¶17, 368 Wis. 2d 265, 878 N.W.2d 736
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039532 - 2025-11-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. Owens, 2016 WI App 2, ¶17, 368 Wis. 2d 265, 878 N.W.2d 736
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039532 - 2025-11-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
exercise of discretion standard. State v. Owens, 2006 WI App 75, ¶¶7, 9, 291 Wis. 2d 229, 713 N.W.2d 187
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542925 - 2022-07-13

State v. Jason D. Landrath
the owner’s testimony as credible, State v. Owens, 148 Wis. 2d 922, 930, 436 N.W.2d 869 (1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5414 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] John C. Theama v. Police and Fire Commission of the Village of Sturtevant
not review the just cause determinations. See Owens v. Board of Police & Fire Comm’rs, 122 Wis.2d 449, 451
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12805 - 2017-09-21

John C. Theama v. Police and Fire Commission of the Village of Sturtevant
is “final and conclusive” and this court may not review the just cause determinations. See Owens v. Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12805 - 2005-03-31