Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 281 - 290 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 281 - 290 of 59688 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of closing, Mednikow also drafted a quit-claim deed, real estate transfer return, corporate consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89671 - 2014-09-15
of closing, Mednikow also drafted a quit-claim deed, real estate transfer return, corporate consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89671 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-day trial featuring experts opining on deeds and surveys, childhood stories of what the area looked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
-day trial featuring experts opining on deeds and surveys, childhood stories of what the area looked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
it to their daughter, Edna Fassbinder. Id. This is the lot now owned by the Krepels. Id. The deed from the Ingalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19
it to their daughter, Edna Fassbinder. Id. This is the lot now owned by the Krepels. Id. The deed from the Ingalls
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9230 - 2017-09-19
Lou Krepel v. Esther Darnell
' easement claim appears in their chain of title by virtue of the 1952 corrective deed from Fassbinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9230 - 2005-03-31
' easement claim appears in their chain of title by virtue of the 1952 corrective deed from Fassbinder
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9230 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Steven J. Wickenhauser v. Jack Lehtinen
a quit claim deed conveying him that interest. The Wickenhausers refused. On March 28, 2001, Lehtinen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20888 - 2017-09-21
a quit claim deed conveying him that interest. The Wickenhausers refused. On March 28, 2001, Lehtinen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20888 - 2017-09-21
Steven J. Wickenhauser v. Jack Lehtinen
owned one-half of the property and asked the Wickenhausers to sign a quit claim deed conveying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20888 - 2006-01-09
owned one-half of the property and asked the Wickenhausers to sign a quit claim deed conveying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20888 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19
. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest in the disputed lots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3133 - 2017-09-19
Robert Kucharski v. Andrew L. Kucharski, Jr.
in common. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31
in common. It is this deed that provides the basis for Robert’s claim of a one-eighth legal interest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3133 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of land (the “Barber parcel”), and the deed for that parcel conveys an easement for ingress and egress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
of land (the “Barber parcel”), and the deed for that parcel conveys an easement for ingress and egress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
John L. Yost v. State of Wisconsin Dept. of Transportation
argue their claim that DOT breached the agreement in the warranty deed should not have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31
argue their claim that DOT breached the agreement in the warranty deed should not have been dismissed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9562 - 2005-03-31