Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2801 - 2810 of 29817 for des.
Search results 2801 - 2810 of 29817 for des.
Wiederholt Excavating & Trench v. William Probst
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Brown v. Brown, 177 Wis.2d 512, 516, 503 N.W.2d 280, 281 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14154 - 2005-03-31
, is a question of law that we review de novo. Brown v. Brown, 177 Wis.2d 512, 516, 503 N.W.2d 280, 281 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14154 - 2005-03-31
Rock County v. Richard L.P.
. Stat. §§51.20(1)(a)2, 51.20(13)(e). Richard does not contest the facts on appeal, thus we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19088 - 2005-07-20
. Stat. §§51.20(1)(a)2, 51.20(13)(e). Richard does not contest the facts on appeal, thus we determine de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19088 - 2005-07-20
Christine Connors v. Robert Reimer
in the judgment of divorce with respect to the termination date of maintenance. Christine sought a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13791 - 2005-03-31
in the judgment of divorce with respect to the termination date of maintenance. Christine sought a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13791 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mike Brolin v. Kim Bauers
contention de novo because it alleges the trial court did not apply the correct legal standard. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21508 - 2017-09-21
contention de novo because it alleges the trial court did not apply the correct legal standard. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21508 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary judgment. Johnson v. Mt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96308 - 2014-09-15
. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary judgment. Johnson v. Mt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96308 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop de novo. Id. ¶7 For an investigatory stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35353 - 2014-09-15
whether a reasonable suspicion justified the stop de novo. Id. ¶7 For an investigatory stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35353 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and I review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395419 - 2021-07-22
of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, and I review de novo the application of constitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395419 - 2021-07-22
[PDF]
William J. Rhode v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11811 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11811 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Zong Lor
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6223 - 2017-09-19
, which we review de novo. Pitsch, 124 Wis. 2d at 634. The defendant has the burden of persuasion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6223 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
findings of fact unless they are “clearly erroneous.” We review de novo, however, the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34701 - 2008-11-24
findings of fact unless they are “clearly erroneous.” We review de novo, however, the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34701 - 2008-11-24