Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2801 - 2810 of 81718 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 2801 - 2810 of 81718 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
COURT OF APPEALS
admitted evidence of his blood test results because the blood was not drawn by a person authorized under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35000 - 2008-12-22
admitted evidence of his blood test results because the blood was not drawn by a person authorized under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35000 - 2008-12-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of his blood test results because the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35000 - 2014-09-15
the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of his blood test results because the blood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35000 - 2014-09-15
State v. Amado Saldana, Jr.
and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: donald r. zuidmulder, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14216 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: donald r. zuidmulder, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14216 - 2005-03-31
State v. Amado V. Saldana, Jr.
and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: donald r. zuidmulder, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14511 - 2005-03-31
and an order of the circuit court for Brown County: donald r. zuidmulder, Judge. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14511 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the defense and testified that the blood sample was not contaminated, that standard testing protocol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24
by the defense and testified that the blood sample was not contaminated, that standard testing protocol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=827597 - 2024-07-24
[PDF]
Frontsheet
of the court of appeals, which affirmed the circuit court's order 2 dismissing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104088 - 2017-09-21
of the court of appeals, which affirmed the circuit court's order 2 dismissing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104088 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
of appeals, which affirmed the circuit court's order[2] dismissing their petition under Wis. Stat. ch. 54
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104088 - 2013-11-10
of appeals, which affirmed the circuit court's order[2] dismissing their petition under Wis. Stat. ch. 54
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104088 - 2013-11-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an order of the circuit court for Columbia County: W. ANDREW VOIGT, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854326 - 2024-09-26
an order of the circuit court for Columbia County: W. ANDREW VOIGT, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854326 - 2024-09-26
State v. Thomas J. Haydock
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Walworth County: JOHN R. RACE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11664 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Walworth County: JOHN R. RACE, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11664 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert N. Kroeplin
, P.J.[1] The State appeals an order suppressing the results of Robert Kroeplin’s blood test after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2005-03-31
, P.J.[1] The State appeals an order suppressing the results of Robert Kroeplin’s blood test after he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6729 - 2005-03-31