Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28001 - 28010 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 28001 - 28010 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
State v. Opheous L. Simmons
not see a material difference between the two statements. Because the out-of-court identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8180 - 2017-09-19
not see a material difference between the two statements. Because the out-of-court identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8180 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 20, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
still loved Gray. When he made this statement, the trial court interrupted him, stating that Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27410 - 2006-12-19
still loved Gray. When he made this statement, the trial court interrupted him, stating that Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27410 - 2006-12-19
[PDF]
WI APP 98
said that if given notice, it would consider letting Rashaad participate in opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36652 - 2014-09-15
said that if given notice, it would consider letting Rashaad participate in opening statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36652 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
, [defense counsel], can you give me a brief statement about why it’s a no[-]contest plea? This really isn’t
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147375 - 2015-08-25
, [defense counsel], can you give me a brief statement about why it’s a no[-]contest plea? This really isn’t
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147375 - 2015-08-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. ¶22 R.K.M. also argues that Adler’s opinion was inexplicable in light of R.K.M.’s recent statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713390 - 2023-10-12
. ¶22 R.K.M. also argues that Adler’s opinion was inexplicable in light of R.K.M.’s recent statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713390 - 2023-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, noncompliance and he himself making [a] statement that he does not need any psychotropic medication.” Dave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101704 - 2017-09-21
, noncompliance and he himself making [a] statement that he does not need any psychotropic medication.” Dave
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101704 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a sentence in LIRC’s decision that followed LIRC’s statement that it believed Stroh’s employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102469 - 2017-09-21
a sentence in LIRC’s decision that followed LIRC’s statement that it believed Stroh’s employees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102469 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Pluemer
referred to Pluemer’s statement in Deputy Hartwig’s report that he had to urinate and the court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19708 - 2017-09-21
referred to Pluemer’s statement in Deputy Hartwig’s report that he had to urinate and the court stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19708 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 74
states that it is a final order for purposes of appeal, that statement is not controlling if in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173358 - 2017-09-21
states that it is a final order for purposes of appeal, that statement is not controlling if in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173358 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robin L. Reid
(13) provides: “Rule” means a regulation, standard, statement of policy or general order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6551 - 2017-09-19
(13) provides: “Rule” means a regulation, standard, statement of policy or general order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6551 - 2017-09-19