Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28001 - 28010 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 28001 - 28010 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
Nancy M. White v. Jeffrey A. White
” to which Mr. White refers is the three-prong test found in Van Offeren v. Van Offeren, 173 Wis. 2d 482
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2897 - 2017-09-19
” to which Mr. White refers is the three-prong test found in Van Offeren v. Van Offeren, 173 Wis. 2d 482
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2897 - 2017-09-19
State v. Odell Carter, Jr.
it to apply a six-part test in deciding motions for new trial based on newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16067 - 2005-03-31
it to apply a six-part test in deciding motions for new trial based on newly-discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16067 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martin D. Triplett
find these cases persuasive. Terry teaches that “there is ‘no ready test for determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20168 - 2005-12-20
find these cases persuasive. Terry teaches that “there is ‘no ready test for determining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20168 - 2005-12-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. The probable cause test is “not a high bar,” and “requires only a probability or substantial chance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716537 - 2023-10-17
. The probable cause test is “not a high bar,” and “requires only a probability or substantial chance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=716537 - 2023-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 8, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. at 694. A defendant must meet both parts of the Strickland test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20174 - 2015-08-19
to undermine confidence in the outcome.” Id. at 694. A defendant must meet both parts of the Strickland test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20174 - 2015-08-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, 231 (1999) (test for prejudice is whether there is a reasonable possibility the extraneous information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36798 - 2005-03-31
, 231 (1999) (test for prejudice is whether there is a reasonable possibility the extraneous information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36798 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Xavier B. Smith
to be approximately thirty corner cuts of crack cocaine; testing later verified this assessment. Libal and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21024 - 2017-09-21
to be approximately thirty corner cuts of crack cocaine; testing later verified this assessment. Libal and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21024 - 2017-09-21
State v. Linda R. Cauley
plea after conviction and disposition, Wisconsin applies the "manifest injustice" test set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9590 - 2008-01-16
plea after conviction and disposition, Wisconsin applies the "manifest injustice" test set forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9590 - 2008-01-16
CA Blank Order
was prejudicial to the defense. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test for deficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102167 - 2008-07-15
was prejudicial to the defense. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). The test for deficient
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102167 - 2008-07-15
COURT OF APPEALS
but is identical in meaning to the “clearly erroneous” test now set forth in Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2) (2007-08)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36297 - 2009-04-29
but is identical in meaning to the “clearly erroneous” test now set forth in Wis. Stat. § 805.17(2) (2007-08)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36297 - 2009-04-29