Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28011 - 28020 of 56622 for General Account Probate.
Search results 28011 - 28020 of 56622 for General Account Probate.
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Thomas M.
to December of 1998 for a probation violation. Thomas M. describes himself as a sovereign American citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15617 - 2005-03-31
to December of 1998 for a probation violation. Thomas M. describes himself as a sovereign American citizen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15617 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. H.
for failure to provide potentially incriminating information to the probation officer was a “denied benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4070 - 2005-03-31
for failure to provide potentially incriminating information to the probation officer was a “denied benefit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4070 - 2005-03-31
State v. James C. Sarlund
. Sentence was withheld in all cases and Sarlund was placed on probation for varying terms, with a total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9190 - 2005-03-31
. Sentence was withheld in all cases and Sarlund was placed on probation for varying terms, with a total
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9190 - 2005-03-31
Door County Department of Health & Family Services v. Scott S.
treatment, violations of probation, jail time and seven convictions during his lifetime were far more likely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31
treatment, violations of probation, jail time and seven convictions during his lifetime were far more likely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15269 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. H.
information to the probation officer was a “denied benefit” rather than a penalty for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4070 - 2017-09-20
information to the probation officer was a “denied benefit” rather than a penalty for the purpose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4070 - 2017-09-20
State v. Nicholas Desantos
) (1997-98).[4] Sentence was withheld, and Desantos was placed on probation for ten years to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15679 - 2005-03-31
) (1997-98).[4] Sentence was withheld, and Desantos was placed on probation for ten years to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15679 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James C. Thomson v. United Water Services Milwaukee, LLC
a probation agreement to show they can do the job before moving on to the next position. And I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5647 - 2017-09-19
a probation agreement to show they can do the job before moving on to the next position. And I just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5647 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
three years’ probation with an imposed and stayed sentence of three years’ confinement and four years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
three years’ probation with an imposed and stayed sentence of three years’ confinement and four years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141601 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Thomas F.
than a probation or parole service .... We believe the "services" ordered by the court--which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8717 - 2017-09-19
than a probation or parole service .... We believe the "services" ordered by the court--which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8717 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas Desantos
was placed on probation for ten years to be served concurrently with other sentences. ¶11 “[A]ccording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15679 - 2017-09-21
was placed on probation for ten years to be served concurrently with other sentences. ¶11 “[A]ccording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15679 - 2017-09-21