Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28021 - 28030 of 30177 for de.

[PDF] Wisconsin Housing & EconomicDevelopment Authority v. Flagship
interpretation de novo, according it no weight if the case is one of first impression and the agency lacks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7701 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo. Miller, 392 Wis. 2d 49, ¶15. ¶22 Wisconsin courts employ both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=624199 - 2023-02-17

[PDF] State v. Mustafa M. Mohammad
we review de novo. …. Deficient performance means that counsel “made errors so serious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14205 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] David Pagel v. Robert Gaffney
of law that appellate courts review de novo. Prosser v. Lueck, 225 Wis.2d 126, 136, 592 N.W.2d 178
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14726 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Xiong Yang
of § 885.37(1), STATS. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8705 - 2017-09-19

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32-33. III. DISCUSSION ¶8 Article VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16746 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
policy present questions of law that this court reviews de novo. Mau v. North Dakota Ins. Reserve Fund
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242379 - 2019-08-22

[PDF] WI APP 143
a defendant was denied the due process right to a fair trial is a question of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40095 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 42
, and we review the referee’s conclusions of law de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=885190 - 2025-04-11

Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund v. Wisconsin Health Care Liability Insurance Plan
reviews de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and court of appeals.[3] Determining
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17001 - 2005-03-31