Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28021 - 28030 of 29823 for des.
Search results 28021 - 28030 of 29823 for des.
2007 WI APP 153
is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. The circuit court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29086 - 2007-06-26
is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo. The circuit court conducted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29086 - 2007-06-26
Wisconsin Housing & EconomicDevelopment Authority v. Flagship
. Finally, we review the agency's interpretation de novo, according it no weight if the case is one of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7701 - 2005-03-31
. Finally, we review the agency's interpretation de novo, according it no weight if the case is one of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7701 - 2005-03-31
State v. Allen Tony Davis
reviews de novo. See State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis.2d 244, 249, 426 N.W.2d 91, 93 (Ct. App. 1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13443 - 2005-03-31
reviews de novo. See State v. Fawcett, 145 Wis.2d 244, 249, 426 N.W.2d 91, 93 (Ct. App. 1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13443 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2006-08-06
the circuit court’s factual findings unless they are clearly erroneous. We review de novo whether those facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118853 - 2006-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
). Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law that we review de novo. See Zellner v. Cedarburg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143972 - 2015-07-06
). Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law that we review de novo. See Zellner v. Cedarburg
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143972 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, ¶6, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W.2d 126. Our review is de novo. See State v. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81728 - 2014-09-15
, ¶6, 237 Wis. 2d 709, 616 N.W.2d 126. Our review is de novo. See State v. Borhegyi, 222 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=81728 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline independent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162329 - 2017-09-21
the referee's conclusions of law de novo. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline independent
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162329 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168307 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact are affirmed unless clearly erroneous. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Roger and Donna Anhalt v. Cities and Villages Mutual Insurance Company
by governmental immunity. Standard of Review ¶8 The review of a grant or denial of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3451 - 2017-09-19
by governmental immunity. Standard of Review ¶8 The review of a grant or denial of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3451 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tony M. Smith
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16974 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16974 - 2017-09-21