Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28021 - 28030 of 42002 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 28021 - 28030 of 42002 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
unconstitutionally restricts the defendant’s access to the PSI, we hold that the challenger has a duty to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30090 - 2014-09-15
unconstitutionally restricts the defendant’s access to the PSI, we hold that the challenger has a duty to raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30090 - 2014-09-15
Elizabeth Grissmeyer v. Spiegelhoff's Super Foods Market, Inc.
not remember did not create an affirmative duty for the respondents to inform her of the correct date. In fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15487 - 2005-03-31
not remember did not create an affirmative duty for the respondents to inform her of the correct date. In fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15487 - 2005-03-31
State v. Gerald J. Van Camp
(1)(a) or other mandatory duties, and alleges that he in fact did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10459 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a) or other mandatory duties, and alleges that he in fact did not know or understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10459 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 44
) 70.19(5) already permits a chief judge to adjust caseload to reflect administrative duties
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261582 - 2020-05-18
) 70.19(5) already permits a chief judge to adjust caseload to reflect administrative duties
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261582 - 2020-05-18
[PDF]
State v. James Lanzel
, 471 N.W.2d 24, 29 (1991). The duty of the reviewing court is to ensure that the magistrate had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8339 - 2017-09-19
, 471 N.W.2d 24, 29 (1991). The duty of the reviewing court is to ensure that the magistrate had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8339 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to satisfy a plea colloquy duty, and the defendant alleges that the defendant did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033539 - 2025-11-06
failed to satisfy a plea colloquy duty, and the defendant alleges that the defendant did not understand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033539 - 2025-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
rights. There would be no arguable merit to Taylor’s claim that the circuit court shirked its duties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539085 - 2022-07-06
rights. There would be no arguable merit to Taylor’s claim that the circuit court shirked its duties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=539085 - 2022-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
lack references to specific pages. “We have no duty to scour the record to review arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89857 - 2014-09-15
lack references to specific pages. “We have no duty to scour the record to review arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89857 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. This was a duty of the circuit court at the plea hearing, id., ¶35, which it arguably did not fulfill. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91053 - 2014-09-15
. This was a duty of the circuit court at the plea hearing, id., ¶35, which it arguably did not fulfill. Counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91053 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
OPINION 06-1
with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of the office. As elected officials, judges
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26682 - 2014-09-15
with the impartial performance of the adjudicative duties of the office. As elected officials, judges
/sc/judcond/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26682 - 2014-09-15