Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28021 - 28030 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 28021 - 28030 of 65155 for or b.
State v. Sally S. Boerner
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13575 - 2005-03-31
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(c
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13575 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
809.23(3)(b) (unpublished, authored opinions issued on or after July 1, 2009, may be cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134089 - 2017-09-21
809.23(3)(b) (unpublished, authored opinions issued on or after July 1, 2009, may be cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134089 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an appointment with her physician No. 2010AP3138-CR 4 and obtained a prescription for Plan B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77521 - 2014-09-15
an appointment with her physician No. 2010AP3138-CR 4 and obtained a prescription for Plan B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77521 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Dina Matlin v. City of Sheboygan
, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: JOHN B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2986 - 2017-09-19
, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Sheboygan County: JOHN B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2986 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
—discovered evidence” under § 806.07(1)(b), because the “depreciation problem existed at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32073 - 2014-09-15
—discovered evidence” under § 806.07(1)(b), because the “depreciation problem existed at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32073 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to another person and (b) was aware of that risk. See State v. Brulport, 202 Wis. 2d 505, 519-20, 551 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145202 - 2017-09-21
to another person and (b) was aware of that risk. See State v. Brulport, 202 Wis. 2d 505, 519-20, 551 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145202 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-related driving conviction], contrary to [WIS. STAT. §] 343.44(1)(b), 343.44(2)(ar)2…, a Misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152997 - 2017-09-21
-related driving conviction], contrary to [WIS. STAT. §] 343.44(1)(b), 343.44(2)(ar)2…, a Misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152997 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Burridge waived the preliminary hearing. [2] The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57625 - 2010-12-13
. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Burridge waived the preliminary hearing. [2] The circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57625 - 2010-12-13
Laurie M. Marcukaitis v. State of Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission
or misinterpretation of the law or mistake of evidentiary fact, whether by commission or omission; or (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7219 - 2005-03-31
or misinterpretation of the law or mistake of evidentiary fact, whether by commission or omission; or (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7219 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Stat. § 971.08(1)(b), the court asked the prosecutor for the factual basis for the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113667 - 2014-06-03
. Stat. § 971.08(1)(b), the court asked the prosecutor for the factual basis for the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113667 - 2014-06-03