Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28031 - 28040 of 62161 for child support.
Search results 28031 - 28040 of 62161 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Andrew K. Green
conclude that the totality of the circumstances supports the officer’s investigatory stop and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15824 - 2017-09-21
conclude that the totality of the circumstances supports the officer’s investigatory stop and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15824 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as insufficient to support the charges. On December 6, 2013, the parties appeared for a hearing on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149172 - 2017-09-21
as insufficient to support the charges. On December 6, 2013, the parties appeared for a hearing on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
execution, the warrant’s supporting affidavit was not based on anything the officers saw inside
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
execution, the warrant’s supporting affidavit was not based on anything the officers saw inside
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
Aviation and Myers sought summary judgment. In his affidavit in support of summary judgment, Keith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47195 - 2014-09-15
Aviation and Myers sought summary judgment. In his affidavit in support of summary judgment, Keith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47195 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ronald C. Foust
to support guilt or enhance punishment for another offense. A defendant may not, in a subsequent proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
to support guilt or enhance punishment for another offense. A defendant may not, in a subsequent proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) there was sufficient evidence to support his self-defense claim. We reject these arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159382 - 2017-09-21
) there was sufficient evidence to support his self-defense claim. We reject these arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159382 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and for obstruction of an officer. He argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580256 - 2022-10-26
and for obstruction of an officer. He argues the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580256 - 2022-10-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
defect” existed to trigger warranty coverage, insufficient evidence supports an award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77423 - 2014-09-15
defect” existed to trigger warranty coverage, insufficient evidence supports an award
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77423 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Associates Financial Services Company of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Brandon Harrell
in question, and Cox did not consent to the mortgage. In support of its motion, Associates submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12186 - 2017-09-21
in question, and Cox did not consent to the mortgage. In support of its motion, Associates submitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12186 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained during the investigatory traffic stop. She argues that the stop was not supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
obtained during the investigatory traffic stop. She argues that the stop was not supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16