Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28031 - 28040 of 29966 for de.

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
rendered non- compensable by the doctrine of de minimus non curat lex? 05/12/2015 CERT Oral Arg 10/05
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159380 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added recently accepted cases 2015AP2457, 2016AP2196-CR and 2016AP2214
to the postconviction court’s fact-findings but reviews de novo the legal questions of deficient performance
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193610 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] SC Table of Pending Cases - Added the decision in case no. 2013AP1424-CR
of de minimus non curat lex? 05/12/2015 CERT Affirmed 03/01/2016 2016 WI 13 4 Rock
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165933 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
of de minimus non curat lex? 05/12/2015 CERT Affirmed 03/01/2016 2016 WI 13 4 Rock
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165281 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2021AP001450 - Response of Petitioners to Hunter Intervenors Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
PERKINS AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924hunterresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2014
County Circuit Court decision, Judge John A. Des Jardins, presiding. 2013AP578 State v. Knipfer
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122327 - 2014-09-22

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - January 2017
the committee’s “adopti[on] of 37 conditions of approval was a de jure approval of the [permit]” under
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181614 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] 2021AP001450 - Response of Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists to Motion to Recuse Justice Protasiewicz
PERKINS, AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020724response.pdf - 2024-02-07

[PDF] WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
of counsel, the court of appeals must defer to the postconviction court’s fact-findings but reviews de novo
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197564 - 2017-10-05

[PDF]
ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶21 To demonstrate that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27