Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28031 - 28040 of 40207 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 28031 - 28040 of 40207 for financial disclosure statements.
[PDF]
State v. Opheous L. Simmons
not see a material difference between the two statements. Because the out-of-court identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8180 - 2017-09-19
not see a material difference between the two statements. Because the out-of-court identification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8180 - 2017-09-19
State v. William D. Olson
; (2) counsel should have corrected the trial court's statements at sentencing as to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8359 - 2005-03-31
; (2) counsel should have corrected the trial court's statements at sentencing as to the facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8359 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but the record reflects that trial counsel “noted in writing many times that Mr. Green’s own statements were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696657 - 2023-08-29
, but the record reflects that trial counsel “noted in writing many times that Mr. Green’s own statements were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=696657 - 2023-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing statement contains a number of references to aggravating factors, the factors which the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75291 - 2011-12-19
sentencing statement contains a number of references to aggravating factors, the factors which the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75291 - 2011-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Steven M. Shimek
the statement of prior criminal history in Vetrone’s PSI, to which Shimek had no objection. 4 The transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15083 - 2017-09-21
the statement of prior criminal history in Vetrone’s PSI, to which Shimek had no objection. 4 The transcript
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15083 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Glenn E. Hadley
, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), he stated that “everything [in the prior statements] was true up until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11146 - 2017-09-19
, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), he stated that “everything [in the prior statements] was true up until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11146 - 2017-09-19
State v. Rodney G. Zivcic
it was hearsay. Hearsay is defined as “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13816 - 2005-03-31
it was hearsay. Hearsay is defined as “a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13816 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mayfield Pennington
that the prosecutor’s cross-examination, as well as statements the prosecutor made during closing argument, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16273 - 2005-03-31
that the prosecutor’s cross-examination, as well as statements the prosecutor made during closing argument, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16273 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis A. Denure
to the scene. Gunderson asked Michek to take statements from witnesses, and then followed Denure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3883 - 2005-03-31
to the scene. Gunderson asked Michek to take statements from witnesses, and then followed Denure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3883 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jack Williams
to this court, neither party has provided a statement of the facts. The trial court, however, in its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9559 - 2017-09-19
to this court, neither party has provided a statement of the facts. The trial court, however, in its decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9559 - 2017-09-19