Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28041 - 28050 of 40207 for financial disclosure statements.
Search results 28041 - 28050 of 40207 for financial disclosure statements.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with the circuit court’s statement at the postdisposition hearing that while D.G.’s expert discusses in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253156 - 2020-02-05
with the circuit court’s statement at the postdisposition hearing that while D.G.’s expert discusses in her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253156 - 2020-02-05
COURT OF APPEALS
liability. These statements, with no citation to the record, support our conclusion that counsel knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34227 - 2008-10-06
liability. These statements, with no citation to the record, support our conclusion that counsel knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34227 - 2008-10-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
statement that she could have safely changed lanes is conclusory and an impermissible basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35984 - 2014-09-15
statement that she could have safely changed lanes is conclusory and an impermissible basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35984 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that the evidence would not be admissible. As to counsel’s purported statement that Kostelecky was likely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101867 - 2013-09-09
that the evidence would not be admissible. As to counsel’s purported statement that Kostelecky was likely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101867 - 2013-09-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw his guilty pleas and to suppress his custodial statement. At a subsequent hearing, Stroik
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231140 - 2018-12-18
to withdraw his guilty pleas and to suppress his custodial statement. At a subsequent hearing, Stroik
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231140 - 2018-12-18
[PDF]
State v. John L. Jones
the sentencing statements made on Jones’ behalf, many of which focused on Nicole’s alleged pursuit of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6534 - 2017-09-19
the sentencing statements made on Jones’ behalf, many of which focused on Nicole’s alleged pursuit of him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6534 - 2017-09-19
State v. Scott A. Heimermann
court's statement in Houston that this writ cannot be used as a means to remove perjured testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10013 - 2005-03-31
court's statement in Houston that this writ cannot be used as a means to remove perjured testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10013 - 2005-03-31
State v. Opheous L. Simmons
do not see a material difference between the two statements. Because the out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8180 - 2005-03-31
do not see a material difference between the two statements. Because the out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8180 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992) (we may decline to review arguments supported by only general statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44726 - 2009-12-16
N.W.2d 633 (Ct. App. 1992) (we may decline to review arguments supported by only general statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44726 - 2009-12-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
]. 6 The Lautenbachs take issue with the circuit court’s statement that it agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26890 - 2014-09-15
]. 6 The Lautenbachs take issue with the circuit court’s statement that it agreed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26890 - 2014-09-15