Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28041 - 28050 of 63968 for records/1000.
Search results 28041 - 28050 of 63968 for records/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Richard S. Dammon
. A defendant is entitled to a hearing on the motion unless the motion and the files and records of the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26282 - 2017-09-21
. A defendant is entitled to a hearing on the motion unless the motion and the files and records of the action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26282 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven K. Pinney
. 1 There is some confusion in the record as to whether police were informed that Pinney was armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9995 - 2017-09-19
. 1 There is some confusion in the record as to whether police were informed that Pinney was armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9995 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287685 - 2020-09-16
. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287685 - 2020-09-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. This court has considered the no-merit report and independently reviewed the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189581 - 2017-09-21
not done so. This court has considered the no-merit report and independently reviewed the records
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189581 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
action for legal malpractice. Upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97926 - 2013-06-04
action for legal malpractice. Upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97926 - 2013-06-04
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94784 - 2014-09-15
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94784 - 2014-09-15
Human Services Center v. Francis D. Bocek
the record shows Bocek’s emergency detention was illegal or invalid, it is allowed to recover its costs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15253 - 2005-03-31
the record shows Bocek’s emergency detention was illegal or invalid, it is allowed to recover its costs from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15253 - 2005-03-31
Chapter 35 - Eligibility for Appointment as Guardian ad Litem for a Minor
period. (3) The appointing court has made a finding in writing or on the record
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1078 - 2005-03-31
period. (3) The appointing court has made a finding in writing or on the record
/sc/scrule/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1078 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that counsel’s analysis of those issues is correct and that an appeal on either
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210008 - 2018-03-21
of the record, we conclude that counsel’s analysis of those issues is correct and that an appeal on either
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210008 - 2018-03-21
[PDF]
Human Services Center v. Francis D. Bocek
was valid. Instead, it suggests that unless the record shows Bocek’s emergency detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15253 - 2017-09-21
was valid. Instead, it suggests that unless the record shows Bocek’s emergency detention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15253 - 2017-09-21