Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28041 - 28050 of 38452 for t's.
Search results 28041 - 28050 of 38452 for t's.
COURT OF APPEALS
part: “[t]he second element [of felony murder] requires that the defendant or one he was intentionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30666 - 2007-10-22
part: “[t]he second element [of felony murder] requires that the defendant or one he was intentionally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30666 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the record.” Id. In other words, “[t]he reviewing court looks at the entirety of the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961024 - 2025-05-28
of the record.” Id. In other words, “[t]he reviewing court looks at the entirety of the record to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=961024 - 2025-05-28
State v. Antoine J. Russell
not require personal service of a subpoena. Rather, the test is whether “[t]he party offering the deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7337 - 2005-03-31
not require personal service of a subpoena. Rather, the test is whether “[t]he party offering the deposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7337 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dann P. Knippel
, the trial court denied Knippel’s motion to suppress based on the following reasoning: [T]he trooper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court denied Knippel’s motion to suppress based on the following reasoning: [T]he trooper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11164 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mitchel L. Schanke
. The thrust of Schanke’s argument is that “[t]he initial temporary stop ... was unjustified because officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13749 - 2005-03-31
. The thrust of Schanke’s argument is that “[t]he initial temporary stop ... was unjustified because officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13749 - 2005-03-31
State v. Walter A. Kirch III
such as possession, title and financial stake” in determining ownership of the car. Id. at 474. It noted that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13683 - 2005-03-31
such as possession, title and financial stake” in determining ownership of the car. Id. at 474. It noted that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13683 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was not in custody the officer was permitted to comment on his refusal to answer questions. However, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73098 - 2011-10-31
was not in custody the officer was permitted to comment on his refusal to answer questions. However, “[t]he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73098 - 2011-10-31
Donna R. Catalano v. Gilbert A. Catalano
: [T]he appellant father, who stipulated and consented that the family court enter an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16204 - 2005-03-31
: [T]he appellant father, who stipulated and consented that the family court enter an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16204 - 2005-03-31
State v. James P. Sullivan
343.305(9)(c). The court must decide the matter “[a]t the close of the hearing, or within 5 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
343.305(9)(c). The court must decide the matter “[a]t the close of the hearing, or within 5 days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to her, “[T]his is the last time you’re going to be mean to me.” Based on his voice, mannerisms and what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115637 - 2014-06-30
to her, “[T]his is the last time you’re going to be mean to me.” Based on his voice, mannerisms and what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=115637 - 2014-06-30