Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28051 - 28060 of 56042 for so.
Search results 28051 - 28060 of 56042 for so.
COURT OF APPEALS
-assigned because it found Scott to be “unruly,” so it adjourned the matter, stating that if Scott sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
-assigned because it found Scott to be “unruly,” so it adjourned the matter, stating that if Scott sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33911 - 2008-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
disagreeable” with the medics and “kept repeating over and over that he was so stupid for having done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
disagreeable” with the medics and “kept repeating over and over that he was so stupid for having done
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41625 - 2009-09-28
State v. David Lee Miller
not require proof that Miller possessed an actual gun, so evidence that he possessed a soap gun would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
not require proof that Miller possessed an actual gun, so evidence that he possessed a soap gun would not have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2006-06-14
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Sara M.
), Stats.; that Sara was an unfit parent and that her unfitness was so egregious, by clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
), Stats.; that Sara was an unfit parent and that her unfitness was so egregious, by clear and convincing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13584 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Margaret Smith v. Richard Golde
that because Smith did not raise this issue in the trial court, she waived any right to do so. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3931 - 2017-09-20
that because Smith did not raise this issue in the trial court, she waived any right to do so. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3931 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
that he was told to report to the jail to begin his incarceration, but failed to do so. Id. at 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27488 - 2014-09-15
that he was told to report to the jail to begin his incarceration, but failed to do so. Id. at 264
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27488 - 2014-09-15
State v. Janusz Daca
. There is nothing illegal.” (Exhibit #2, 17:46:06) When told to “take off [his] glasses,” Daca did so. (Id. at 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7360 - 2005-03-31
. There is nothing illegal.” (Exhibit #2, 17:46:06) When told to “take off [his] glasses,” Daca did so. (Id. at 17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7360 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
and the conviction, is so lacking in probative value and force that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133189 - 2015-01-15
and the conviction, is so lacking in probative value and force that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133189 - 2015-01-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the sentence is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101681 - 2013-09-09
the sentence is so excessive and unusual and so disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101681 - 2013-09-09
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89384 - 2012-11-20
was deficient and, if so, prejudicial, present questions of law we review de novo. Id. at 127-28. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89384 - 2012-11-20