Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28071 - 28080 of 58997 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 28071 - 28080 of 58997 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that a claim that a sentence was unduly harsh is a request for sentence modification, see State v. Cummings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253149 - 2020-01-30
that a claim that a sentence was unduly harsh is a request for sentence modification, see State v. Cummings
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253149 - 2020-01-30
William F. Weaver v. Doug Drew
the Weavers' claims against American Family Mutual Insurance Company on the basis of a policy exclusion. Drew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10389 - 2005-03-31
the Weavers' claims against American Family Mutual Insurance Company on the basis of a policy exclusion. Drew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10389 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donnelly Smith
court noted that the same claims had been raised in 2002CT2445. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26267 - 2006-08-21
court noted that the same claims had been raised in 2002CT2445. The trial court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26267 - 2006-08-21
Bank One v. Geneva SVS, Inc.
. Second, they contend that the trial court should not have granted Bank One’s equitable reformation claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5807 - 2005-03-31
. Second, they contend that the trial court should not have granted Bank One’s equitable reformation claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee Post #2874 v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of Milwaukee
, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 32.05(5). ¶2 The VFW claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4093 - 2017-09-20
, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 32.05(5). ¶2 The VFW claims the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4093 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
were committed in this case.” Graham reasserted his claim that because the felony reclassification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239897 - 2019-04-25
were committed in this case.” Graham reasserted his claim that because the felony reclassification
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239897 - 2019-04-25
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion for a new trial based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34518 - 2008-11-11
an order denying his motion for a new trial based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34518 - 2008-11-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Kathleen put the forgiven sum at approximately $12,000.00. The Interested Parties claimed it was $17,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251728 - 2019-12-26
. Kathleen put the forgiven sum at approximately $12,000.00. The Interested Parties claimed it was $17,000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251728 - 2019-12-26
[PDF]
Bank One v. Geneva SVS, Inc.
that the trial court should not have granted Bank One’s equitable reformation claim. We reject both arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5807 - 2017-09-19
that the trial court should not have granted Bank One’s equitable reformation claim. We reject both arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5807 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Martha Brock v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board
Brock’s claim for a temporary injunction, and restraining the PRB from proceeding with the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12007 - 2017-09-21
Brock’s claim for a temporary injunction, and restraining the PRB from proceeding with the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12007 - 2017-09-21