Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28071 - 28080 of 29966 for de.
Search results 28071 - 28080 of 29966 for de.
Brown County v. Kathy C.
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2691 - 2005-03-31
that this court decides de novo. See Johnson, 133 Wis. 2d at 216. ¶39 Kathy first argues that her trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2691 - 2005-03-31
Monroe County v. Jennifer V.
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Wittrock, 119 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9924 - 2005-03-31
. The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Wittrock, 119 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9924 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark Inglin
an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316, 538 N.W.2d 810, 813
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13173 - 2005-03-31
an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316, 538 N.W.2d 810, 813
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13173 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
reviews de novo. Noffke ex No. 2016AP1517 9 rel. Swenson v. Bakke, 2009 WI 10, ¶9, 315
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233081 - 2019-01-18
reviews de novo. Noffke ex No. 2016AP1517 9 rel. Swenson v. Bakke, 2009 WI 10, ¶9, 315
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233081 - 2019-01-18
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
grant Mitsubishi’s petition for supervisory relief concluding, after a de novo review, Bilder, 112 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17560 - 2005-03-31
grant Mitsubishi’s petition for supervisory relief concluding, after a de novo review, Bilder, 112 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17560 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Allen M.
of a statute presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12260 - 2017-09-21
of a statute presents a question of law this court reviews de novo. See State v. Post, 197 Wis.2d 279, 301
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12260 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 15
“Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 378
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=494872 - 2022-05-10
“Statutory interpretation presents a question of law, which we review de novo.” Auto-Owners Ins. Co., 378
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=494872 - 2022-05-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
agreement, and whether a breach was material and substantial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27039 - 2014-09-15
agreement, and whether a breach was material and substantial, are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27039 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
is a question of law which we review de novo. Watts v. Watts, 137 Wis.2d 506, 512, 405 N.W.2d 303, 306 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10617 - 2017-09-20
is a question of law which we review de novo. Watts v. Watts, 137 Wis.2d 506, 512, 405 N.W.2d 303, 306 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10617 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
William K. Garfoot v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company
or that the actor intended to destroy evidence. This is a legal question, which we review de novo, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14128 - 2014-09-15
or that the actor intended to destroy evidence. This is a legal question, which we review de novo, while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14128 - 2014-09-15