Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28071 - 28080 of 39862 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 28071 - 28080 of 39862 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Roger E. Smiley
court read and considered the presentence report, and the statements of counsel. The court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13638 - 2005-03-31
court read and considered the presentence report, and the statements of counsel. The court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13638 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
County of Calumet v. Dennis P. Ragen
court made the following statement: [T]he proof here, Mr. Ragen, shows that the vehicle registered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12780 - 2017-09-21
court made the following statement: [T]he proof here, Mr. Ragen, shows that the vehicle registered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12780 - 2017-09-21
State v. Clifford R. Rucks
his views as accurate statements of the law, which we do not. ¶9 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5792 - 2005-03-31
his views as accurate statements of the law, which we do not. ¶9 Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John W. Moore
2 several arguments. Attached as an appendix to this opinion is the statement of issues from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11951 - 2017-09-21
2 several arguments. Attached as an appendix to this opinion is the statement of issues from his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11951 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Carl G. Brosinski
) in August 1993, the arresting officer in this case filed a Statement of Emergency Detention of Haugen under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9050 - 2017-09-19
) in August 1993, the arresting officer in this case filed a Statement of Emergency Detention of Haugen under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9050 - 2017-09-19
CA Blank Order
reliance, if any, on the State’s statement at the hearing on the motion for reconsideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21
reliance, if any, on the State’s statement at the hearing on the motion for reconsideration
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93368 - 2013-02-21
State v. Scott A. Garrigan
of the accident, but Garrigan made inconsistent statements about observing Peetz’s directional signal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6127 - 2005-03-31
of the accident, but Garrigan made inconsistent statements about observing Peetz’s directional signal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6127 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI 38
is not required to sign the pleading, motion, or document. Any such document must contain a statement
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258376 - 2020-04-17
is not required to sign the pleading, motion, or document. Any such document must contain a statement
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258376 - 2020-04-17
01-14A Amendment of SCR 70.245, 71.01, 71.04 regarding court reporters (unpublished version, with comments)
of a proceeding, such as: 1. Jury voir dire; 2. Opening statements; 3. Witness names in chronological order
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=958 - 2005-03-31
of a proceeding, such as: 1. Jury voir dire; 2. Opening statements; 3. Witness names in chronological order
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Taylor’s argument that the right to self-represent is absolute appears to rely entirely on a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107795 - 2017-09-21
Taylor’s argument that the right to self-represent is absolute appears to rely entirely on a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107795 - 2017-09-21