Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28071 - 28080 of 63537 for records.

State v. Michael Goldsmith
status under § 973.12(1), Stats. Because there was proof of Goldsmith's repeater status in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7938 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=472186 - 2022-01-13

CA Blank Order
the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103463 - 2013-10-22

[PDF] NOTICE
recording of his statement. Parker argues that, by failing to present the “best evidence” that might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30702 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
of fact, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28298 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193886 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967), we conclude that counsel shall
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=432225 - 2021-09-28

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a response. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=375914 - 2021-06-10

State v. Steven W. Schmidt
contemplates a process or reasoning based on facts that are of record or that are reasonably derived
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9074 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=288382 - 2020-09-22