Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28081 - 28090 of 62284 for child support.
Search results 28081 - 28090 of 62284 for child support.
Gregory Thornton v. City of Milwaukee
and unjustified. This finding is supported by the evidence and is not clearly erroneous. Several factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5648 - 2005-03-31
and unjustified. This finding is supported by the evidence and is not clearly erroneous. Several factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5648 - 2005-03-31
Dean Medical Center v. Karri P. Hubanks
, and the collection statement was inadmissible hearsay. In support of their contention, the Hubanks cite § 799.209(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13364 - 2005-03-31
, and the collection statement was inadmissible hearsay. In support of their contention, the Hubanks cite § 799.209(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13364 - 2005-03-31
State v. Keith A. Glass
to the crime. Glass argues that the following evidence supports his conclusion: (1) the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4323 - 2005-03-31
to the crime. Glass argues that the following evidence supports his conclusion: (1) the victim’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4323 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Thomas did not offer any evidence in support of his motion to suppress. Thomas argued that he reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
Thomas did not offer any evidence in support of his motion to suppress. Thomas argued that he reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
execution, the warrant’s supporting affidavit was not based on anything the officers saw inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
execution, the warrant’s supporting affidavit was not based on anything the officers saw inside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=834135 - 2024-08-06
State v. Dennis G. Valstad
, namely, that probable cause did not exist to support Teachout’s request that he submit to the PBT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
, namely, that probable cause did not exist to support Teachout’s request that he submit to the PBT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6260 - 2005-03-31
State v. Maurice S. Ewing
Ewing did not testify at trial. He presented three witnesses to support his alibi that he was moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19333 - 2005-09-19
Ewing did not testify at trial. He presented three witnesses to support his alibi that he was moving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19333 - 2005-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Andrew K. Green
conclude that the totality of the circumstances supports the officer’s investigatory stop and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15824 - 2017-09-21
conclude that the totality of the circumstances supports the officer’s investigatory stop and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15824 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). The burden of showing the Board’s decision was not supported by credible and substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355150 - 2021-04-13
). The burden of showing the Board’s decision was not supported by credible and substantial evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355150 - 2021-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS
to a challenge of the orders requiring their protective placement, which they claim was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06
to a challenge of the orders requiring their protective placement, which they claim was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92610 - 2013-02-06