Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28081 - 28090 of 30177 for de.

[PDF] WI APP 153
assessment is a question of statutory interpretation that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29086 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 32
assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. A. Deficient Performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353014 - 2021-06-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
barred is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Fortier, 2006 WI App 11, ΒΆ18, 289 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98380 - 2014-09-15

Village of Hobart v. Brown County
. Although our review of the circuit court's grant of summary judgment is de novo, we apply the same
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18579 - 2005-06-14

[PDF] WI APP 36
is de novo, and we apply the same methodology as the circuit court. Springer v. Nohl Elec. Prods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=670172 - 2023-08-08

State v. Lorenzo A. Mares
unless clearly erroneous. Id. However, we review de novo the application of constitutional principles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5095 - 2005-03-31

The Manor Enterprises, Inc. v. Vivid, Inc.
as the trial court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14152 - 2005-03-31

Daanen & Janssen, Inc v. Cedarapids, Inc
has stated a claim for relief is a pure question of law, which we review de novo. See Sunnyslope
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17254 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel Anderson
from double jeopardy has been violated is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See State
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17082 - 2005-03-31

Wisconsin Housing & EconomicDevelopment Authority v. Flagship
. Finally, we review the agency's interpretation de novo, according it no weight if the case is one of first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7701 - 2005-03-31