Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28081 - 28090 of 84661 for simple case search/1000.

[PDF] City of Sheboygan v. Bradley R. Taylor
that NGI is irrelevant to this kind of case where mens rea is not at issue. The court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4781 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
facie case that he did not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waive his right to counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33255 - 2014-09-15

First Federal Savings Bank LaCrosse-Madison v. Patricia A. Vetterkind
relief the judgment can afford is replevin. This court agrees and, accordingly, remands the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10572 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment in favor of Guardian Pipeline, LLC. This is one of several cases brought by landowners against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28366 - 2007-03-07

[PDF] CA Blank Order
charges as a repeater. The charges were filed in two separate cases. In exchange for his guilty pleas
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100280 - 2017-09-21

Certification
if the case were retried, and the court’s conclusion that “equity would demand that someone … pay
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29942 - 2007-08-08

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2023-24).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1102718 - 2026-04-15

COURT OF APPEALS
] and (2) to properly investigate the case—specifically, that counsel failed to call or consult an expert
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92944 - 2013-02-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483089 - 2022-02-16

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Corrected Brief in Support of Democratic Senators Proposed Maps
, FILED 01-16-2024 CLERK OF WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT Case 2023AP001399 Corrected Brief in Support
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_011724correctedbriefdemsen.pdf - 2024-01-17