Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28091 - 28100 of 46039 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 28091 - 28100 of 46039 for paternity test paper work.
COURT OF APPEALS
of tests. The bill for these services amounted to $2,949.02. A claim for payment was submitted to the VA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64785 - 2011-05-23
of tests. The bill for these services amounted to $2,949.02. A claim for payment was submitted to the VA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=64785 - 2011-05-23
State v. Allen K. Goldsmith
is challenged for failure to establish probable cause, the test is whether "the charges are not capricious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10534 - 2005-03-31
is challenged for failure to establish probable cause, the test is whether "the charges are not capricious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10534 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the fallibility of eyewitness identification. We apply the familiar test for ineffectiveness under Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90204 - 2014-09-15
the fallibility of eyewitness identification. We apply the familiar test for ineffectiveness under Strickland v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90204 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not successfully complete field sobriety tests and, after being taken to the hospital, his blood results showed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131260 - 2017-09-21
not successfully complete field sobriety tests and, after being taken to the hospital, his blood results showed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131260 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
the first part of the ineffective assistance test, the circuit court concluded that the victim’s statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
the first part of the ineffective assistance test, the circuit court concluded that the victim’s statement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114318 - 2014-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Randall D. Peterson
N.W.2d 804 (1988). Stated differently, “The test is ‘whether a reasonable person in the [suspect's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4940 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 804 (1988). Stated differently, “The test is ‘whether a reasonable person in the [suspect's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4940 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
]hat constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40058 - 2014-09-15
]hat constitutes reasonable suspicion is a common sense test: under all the facts and circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40058 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert L. Dumas
). The test for a court to apply is “whether the circumstances would warrant a person of reasonable caution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31
). The test for a court to apply is “whether the circumstances would warrant a person of reasonable caution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13305 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Anthony R. Phillips v. Kenneth Morgan
was such that the committee might reasonably make the determination in question. As to this last factor, the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12779 - 2017-09-21
was such that the committee might reasonably make the determination in question. As to this last factor, the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12779 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kathleen A. Bindel v. Shela M. Jennings
satisfied the “usually improved” test, because they were uses and activities of a typical owner. The uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25029 - 2017-09-21
satisfied the “usually improved” test, because they were uses and activities of a typical owner. The uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25029 - 2017-09-21