Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 50845 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Anggaran Dana Pemasangan Pintu Kaca Office Surakarta.

[PDF] State v. Mark H. Brooks
that the police officers lacked reasonable suspicion to stop him based upon an unsubstantiated drug sale tip
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15799 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. The County challenges the circuit court’s suppression ruling that the officer lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34375 - 2014-05-29

State v. Roscoe Patterson
was later transported to view the suspects who had been apprehended in a traffic stop. Other officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2008-10-26

State v. Kevin W. Coffey
in the crash and, when questioned by a police officer arriving at the scene, stated that he lost control
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10762 - 2005-03-31

Steven T. Robinson v. City of West Allis
-Respondent, v. City of West Allis, Officer Anthony R. Ball and Officer James Schumitsch, Defendants
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17392 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to suppress evidence discovered by officers after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12755 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
, asserting the arresting officers lacked probable cause. A hearing on the motion was conducted May 22, 2014
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132026 - 2014-12-22

[PDF] State v. Jeffry D. Paterson
denied his motion to suppress evidence discovered by officers after a warrentless entry into his home
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12755 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to suppress evidence relating to his arrest, asserting the arresting officers lacked probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132026 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Robert Vines, Jr. v. Don Norenberg
involved, including the name of the state officer, employe or agent involved." In Modica v. Verhulst, 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9423 - 2017-09-19