Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 62324 for child support.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Notice Division of Milwaukee Child Protective Services Charmian Klyve 635 North 26th Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1000029 - 2025-08-20

Jeffrey S. * v. Thomas A.f. *
awards of child custody and support in matrimonial actions. Section 767.24, Stats., for example
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9151 - 2010-03-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that J.A., her son, was a child in need of protection or services (CHIPS). The State argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=269505 - 2020-07-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
for the child as a result of the termination. See id. The court’s findings in support of termination were
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101279 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to determine each child’s best interests. The court found the following: (1) there was a high likelihood
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718350 - 2023-10-24

[PDF] NOTICE
was not fully cooperative with his parent visitation monitor or with the parent support worker’s attempts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32993 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
.‑C. and J.A.M. At birth, the Division of Milwaukee Child Protective Services (DMCPS) imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350050 - 2021-04-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
rights of the children’s mother, S.Z. As to each child, for each parent, the County alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586201 - 2022-11-03

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a child sex offender and that these questions supported Sean’s theory of defense at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954673 - 2025-05-08

State v. Charles E.
the full restitution. Because there is no evidence to support a finding that Charles has the ability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9456 - 2005-03-31