Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
commissioner denied the motion, Meyer-Spidell sought de novo review from the circuit court. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976392 - 2025-07-02
commissioner denied the motion, Meyer-Spidell sought de novo review from the circuit court. ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=976392 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
principles to those facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. County of Grant v. Vogt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141752 - 2017-09-21
principles to those facts presents a question of law subject to de novo review. County of Grant v. Vogt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141752 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301006 - 2020-11-04
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301006 - 2020-11-04
County of Green Lake v. Paul J. Mertz
are mandatory.[5] This presents a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18269 - 2005-05-24
are mandatory.[5] This presents a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. State v. Sveum
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18269 - 2005-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
acceptance of responsibility … as ‘de minimus’” and considered that to be an aggravating factor; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35639 - 2009-02-23
acceptance of responsibility … as ‘de minimus’” and considered that to be an aggravating factor; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35639 - 2009-02-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
de novo whether a hearing is required under these standards. See id., ¶23. To show ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237313 - 2019-03-11
de novo whether a hearing is required under these standards. See id., ¶23. To show ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237313 - 2019-03-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 236-37. ¶6 Neuaone’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27102 - 2014-09-15
assistance is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 236-37. ¶6 Neuaone’s trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27102 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). We review this issue de novo because “[w]hether the fact or set of facts put forth by the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087493 - 2026-03-11
). We review this issue de novo because “[w]hether the fact or set of facts put forth by the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087493 - 2026-03-11
State v. Colleen M. Thomas
the issue de novo. See State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 445, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991). Nonetheless, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31
the issue de novo. See State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 445, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991). Nonetheless, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Pritchard v. Madison Metro. Sch. Dist., 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274517 - 2020-08-04
of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Pritchard v. Madison Metro. Sch. Dist., 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274517 - 2020-08-04