Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 68445 for did.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 68445 for did.
State v. Eric Davis
the intruder as Davis. Jenna did not testify at trial for medical reasons. At trial, Yarees identified Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13594 - 2005-03-31
the intruder as Davis. Jenna did not testify at trial for medical reasons. At trial, Yarees identified Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13594 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel H. Frasch
that Hagen was "nutty" and that he did not want to be jointly tried with him because he thought Hagen would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8864 - 2017-09-19
that Hagen was "nutty" and that he did not want to be jointly tried with him because he thought Hagen would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8864 - 2017-09-19
State v. Todd A. Murdock
told Young that he did not wish to speak to him and asked him to leave. Young then turned to the boy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15043 - 2005-03-31
told Young that he did not wish to speak to him and asked him to leave. Young then turned to the boy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15043 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
- defense. We conclude the circuit court did not err and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50428 - 2014-09-15
- defense. We conclude the circuit court did not err and therefore affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The battery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50428 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
many times did he tell you this? A I don’t recall how many times, sir. Q Well, was it two times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76240 - 2014-09-15
many times did he tell you this? A I don’t recall how many times, sir. Q Well, was it two times
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jose Trevino
because his trial counsel did not properly impeach the State’s primary witness and failed to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12630 - 2017-09-21
because his trial counsel did not properly impeach the State’s primary witness and failed to request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12630 - 2017-09-21
State v. Shaun E. Kelley
motion, based on an illegal search of his apartment. Because the trial court did not err in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18776 - 2005-09-19
motion, based on an illegal search of his apartment. Because the trial court did not err in denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18776 - 2005-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
complaint against the Florence Utility Commission (the utility).[1] Because Renneke did not file any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57151 - 2010-11-29
complaint against the Florence Utility Commission (the utility).[1] Because Renneke did not file any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57151 - 2010-11-29
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a). We conclude the circuit court did not err in revoking the deferred prosecution agreement and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33176 - 2008-06-25
)(a). We conclude the circuit court did not err in revoking the deferred prosecution agreement and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33176 - 2008-06-25
[PDF]
Gregg E. Waterman v. Theresa Roetter
conclude that Waterman did not intentionally violate the circuit court’s orders because the orders did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15
conclude that Waterman did not intentionally violate the circuit court’s orders because the orders did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14155 - 2014-09-15