Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 12955 for prosecuting.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 12955 for prosecuting.
COURT OF APPEALS
jurisdiction, but were in fact “first” offenses and therefore required prosecution by the City. Murphy argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74375 - 2011-12-11
jurisdiction, but were in fact “first” offenses and therefore required prosecution by the City. Murphy argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74375 - 2011-12-11
State v. Gary Tate
is able to plead and prepare a defense and whether conviction or acquittal is a bar to another prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16195 - 2005-03-31
is able to plead and prepare a defense and whether conviction or acquittal is a bar to another prosecution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16195 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
jeopardy nor due process prohibits a second prosecution in this case because Thorstad moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
jeopardy nor due process prohibits a second prosecution in this case because Thorstad moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83136 - 2012-05-30
State v. Matthew R.L.
dismissed for lack of prosecutive merit. The following month, he was again referred for trespass when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31
dismissed for lack of prosecutive merit. The following month, he was again referred for trespass when he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12080 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas A. Lisney
. Withholding exculpatory evidence ¶15 Lisney argues the prosecution withheld exculpatory and impeachment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3179 - 2005-03-31
. Withholding exculpatory evidence ¶15 Lisney argues the prosecution withheld exculpatory and impeachment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3179 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Vlado Gazic
in the way it prosecuted the case. We conclude that counsel’s failure to object to this statement did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3183 - 2017-09-19
in the way it prosecuted the case. We conclude that counsel’s failure to object to this statement did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3183 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel M. Abraham
against compulsory self-incrimination. The prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5658 - 2017-09-19
against compulsory self-incrimination. The prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5658 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel M. Abraham
. The prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5658 - 2005-03-31
. The prosecution may not use statements, whether exculpatory or inculpatory, stemming from custodial interrogation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5658 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Matthew R.L.
trespass and damage to property, but the charges were dismissed for lack of prosecutive merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12080 - 2017-09-21
trespass and damage to property, but the charges were dismissed for lack of prosecutive merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12080 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a second prosecution in this case because Thorstad moved for the mistrial and was not induced to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83136 - 2014-09-15
a second prosecution in this case because Thorstad moved for the mistrial and was not induced to do so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83136 - 2014-09-15