Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 6139 for sheriff.
Search results 2811 - 2820 of 6139 for sheriff.
County of Green Lake v. Donna Polakowski
to the trial court’s ruling, the protections of the Fourth Amendment are not contingent upon a sheriff deputy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7278 - 2005-03-31
to the trial court’s ruling, the protections of the Fourth Amendment are not contingent upon a sheriff deputy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7278 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
at the station was then relayed to a detective with the Dane County Sheriff’s Department, who coordinated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04
at the station was then relayed to a detective with the Dane County Sheriff’s Department, who coordinated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84417 - 2012-07-04
COURT OF APPEALS
24, 2004.[3] ¶4 Prior to the scheduling of a sheriff’s sale in that 2004 foreclosure action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35945 - 2009-05-11
24, 2004.[3] ¶4 Prior to the scheduling of a sheriff’s sale in that 2004 foreclosure action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35945 - 2009-05-11
[PDF]
State v. David A. Porth, Sr.
and the burglaries. ¶5 The State called Washington County Deputy Sheriff Mark Sette to the stand to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
and the burglaries. ¶5 The State called Washington County Deputy Sheriff Mark Sette to the stand to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4539 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50694 - 2010-06-07
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50694 - 2010-06-07
[PDF]
State v. Joseph K. Bryant
how it got there.” ¶3 Ollila transported Bryant to the Kenosha County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19
how it got there.” ¶3 Ollila transported Bryant to the Kenosha County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2377 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a hospital in St. Paul, Minnesota, at 12:16 a.m. ¶6 Sergeant Thomas Williams drove to the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483663 - 2022-02-15
to a hospital in St. Paul, Minnesota, at 12:16 a.m. ¶6 Sergeant Thomas Williams drove to the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483663 - 2022-02-15
court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion ...
Sheriff’s Department; (2) the sheriff’s department was unable to locate Montalvo in Milwaukee County; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89924 - 2013-01-29
Sheriff’s Department; (2) the sheriff’s department was unable to locate Montalvo in Milwaukee County; and (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89924 - 2013-01-29
State v. William T. Ackerman
degrees below zero, Deputy Sheriff Jay Fitzgerald of the Grant County Police Department observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
degrees below zero, Deputy Sheriff Jay Fitzgerald of the Grant County Police Department observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11637 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Paul W.
the listing for Sheriff’s Office “frequently asked questions,” provides the following information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5867 - 2017-09-19
the listing for Sheriff’s Office “frequently asked questions,” provides the following information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5867 - 2017-09-19