Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28101 - 28110 of 38289 for t's.
Search results 28101 - 28110 of 38289 for t's.
COURT OF APPEALS
481 (“[I]t is improper to order restitution to a party with no relationship to the crime of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34461 - 2008-12-16
481 (“[I]t is improper to order restitution to a party with no relationship to the crime of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34461 - 2008-12-16
Kenosha County Department of Child & Family Services v. Cornelius N. F.
of a written stipulation and order to such effect by the prosecutor. Then the court said: “[T]he Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6378 - 2005-03-31
of a written stipulation and order to such effect by the prosecutor. Then the court said: “[T]he Court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6378 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. MARIO T. TUCKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, V. MARIO T. TUCKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010725 - 2025-09-18
State v. Scott Elvers
. Carprue, 2004 WI 111, 274 Wis. 2d 656, ¶49, 683 N.W.2d 31. (“[I]t is appropriate to assume for the sake
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18765 - 2005-06-28
. Carprue, 2004 WI 111, 274 Wis. 2d 656, ¶49, 683 N.W.2d 31. (“[I]t is appropriate to assume for the sake
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18765 - 2005-06-28
COURT OF APPEALS
the door. Id. ¶14 “[T]o dispense with the rule of announcement, ‘the police must have a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75120 - 2010-06-21
the door. Id. ¶14 “[T]o dispense with the rule of announcement, ‘the police must have a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75120 - 2010-06-21
State v. Fairly W. Earls
in State v. Eugenio, 219 Wis. 2d 391, 405, 579 N.W.2d 642 (1998). “[T]he determination of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2953 - 2005-03-31
in State v. Eugenio, 219 Wis. 2d 391, 405, 579 N.W.2d 642 (1998). “[T]he determination of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2953 - 2005-03-31
City of Mequon v. Kenneth Hosale
, Hosale’s response focuses only on his argument that “[t]here were no alterations to the first floor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2009-09-10
, Hosale’s response focuses only on his argument that “[t]here were no alterations to the first floor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11907 - 2009-09-10
COURT OF APPEALS
that Wohlfeil was sentenced on accurate information. [T]he preliminary showing for an in camera review requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31561 - 2005-07-26
that Wohlfeil was sentenced on accurate information. [T]he preliminary showing for an in camera review requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31561 - 2005-07-26
09AP5 State v. Jill Y. Treleven.doc
.” She also faults the trial court for not providing the statute number, “[t]he Court never indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30
.” She also faults the trial court for not providing the statute number, “[t]he Court never indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36906 - 2009-06-30
COURT OF APPEALS
: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68534 - 2005-12-12
: DOUGLAS T. FOX, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68534 - 2005-12-12