Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28111 - 28120 of 38452 for t's.

State v. Christopher L. Ambort
as follows: “[T]he state didn’t provide notice [as required under Wis. Stat. §] 343.305(9)(a) before Chris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26093 - 2006-08-02

COURT OF APPEALS
things. Meis filed a motion for a de novo hearing, claiming “[t]he competency of the petitioner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35478 - 2009-02-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 15, 2022 Sheila T. Reiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=566472 - 2022-09-15

[PDF] State v. John Yang
“as party to the crime of battery.” The court then said: “[T]hey are also charged as having
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4649 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
has previously explained that “[i]t is no defense to this code provision that the landlord believed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96519 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
hitting noises.” He then saw the vehicle “coming quickly.” A.P. testified, “[I]t was outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=145202 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Curtis W.Ross
ignores the fundamental proposition that “[t]he function of weighing the credibility of witnesses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16126 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED July 14, 2021 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390669 - 2021-07-14

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 27, 2018 Sheila T. Reiff Clerk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209000 - 2018-02-27

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
“said many things … [that] [i]t [was] kind of hard for [him] to remember” saying particular things
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187361 - 2017-09-21