Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28121 - 28130 of 29713 for des.
Search results 28121 - 28130 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
of counsel, the court of appeals must defer to the postconviction court’s fact-findings but reviews de novo
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197564 - 2017-10-05
of counsel, the court of appeals must defer to the postconviction court’s fact-findings but reviews de novo
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197564 - 2017-10-05
[PDF]
State v. Gary Lewis Petty
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16870 - 2017-09-21
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶21 To demonstrate that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27
ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶21 To demonstrate that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
. § 802.08(2). ¶23 I review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729518 - 2023-11-16
. § 802.08(2). ¶23 I review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729518 - 2023-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382251 - 2021-06-29
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382251 - 2021-06-29
[PDF]
WI App 47
, such as the interpretation of a municipal ordinance, our review is de novo. See id.; A & A Enters. v. City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980292 - 2025-09-18
, such as the interpretation of a municipal ordinance, our review is de novo. See id.; A & A Enters. v. City of Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980292 - 2025-09-18
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Gilmore
is an issue of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16893 - 2017-09-21
is an issue of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16893 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nancy Lamoreux v. Stephen L. Oreck
of summary judgment, we employ the same standard as that of the trial court, and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6724 - 2017-09-20
of summary judgment, we employ the same standard as that of the trial court, and our review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6724 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
M. Carol Weissgerber v. Hans Weissgerber, Jr.
a reasonable conclusion. Id. Our review of the circuit court’s decision here is therefore not de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6047 - 2017-09-19
a reasonable conclusion. Id. Our review of the circuit court’s decision here is therefore not de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6047 - 2017-09-19
Sheboygan County DSS v. Matthew S.
. We therefore review this question de novo, benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18672 - 2005-06-21
. We therefore review this question de novo, benefiting from the analyses of the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18672 - 2005-06-21