Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28121 - 28130 of 29827 for des.
Search results 28121 - 28130 of 29827 for des.
COURT OF APPEALS
a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Wausau Tile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84795 - 2012-07-11
a complaint states a claim for relief is a question of law that appellate courts review de novo. Wausau Tile
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84795 - 2012-07-11
COURT OF APPEALS
is de novo. State v. Lock, 2012 WI App 99, ¶¶40-43, 344 Wis. 2d 166, 823 N.W.2d 378, review denied, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
is de novo. State v. Lock, 2012 WI App 99, ¶¶40-43, 344 Wis. 2d 166, 823 N.W.2d 378, review denied, 2013
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109569 - 2014-03-26
[PDF]
WI App 179
questions of law subject to independent, de novo review. See State v. Faust, 2004 WI 99, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42947 - 2014-09-15
questions of law subject to independent, de novo review. See State v. Faust, 2004 WI 99, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42947 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI App 63
issues of law that we review de novo. State v. McGuire, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855648 - 2024-12-18
issues of law that we review de novo. State v. McGuire, 2010
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=855648 - 2024-12-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law that we review de novo, see Lemke v. Lemke, 2012 WI App 96, ¶28, 343 Wis. 2d 748, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773829 - 2024-03-12
is a question of law that we review de novo, see Lemke v. Lemke, 2012 WI App 96, ¶28, 343 Wis. 2d 748, 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=773829 - 2024-03-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Interpretation. ¶16 We review a circuit court’s decision to grant or deny summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
Interpretation. ¶16 We review a circuit court’s decision to grant or deny summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=536142 - 2022-06-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo the legal questions of whether counsel’s performance was constitutionally deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163871 - 2017-09-21
review de novo the legal questions of whether counsel’s performance was constitutionally deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163871 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17515 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17515 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
competency is questioned upon remand, the circuit court shall address the issue de novo. Id. II ¶20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141057 - 2017-09-21
competency is questioned upon remand, the circuit court shall address the issue de novo. Id. II ¶20
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141057 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the Trust’s argument that the DNR denied the Trust’s permit application based on “a de facto policy that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1031802 - 2025-11-04
the Trust’s argument that the DNR denied the Trust’s permit application based on “a de facto policy that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1031802 - 2025-11-04