Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28121 - 28130 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.

[PDF] 01-14 Amendment of SCR 70.245, 71.01, 71.04 regarding court reporters (Effective 07-01-02)
, such as: 1. Jury voir dire; 2. Opening statements; 3. Witness names in chronological order
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959 - 2017-09-20

CA Blank Order
. Nieves confirmed that his attorney’s statement was correct. In light of the foregoing, we are satisfied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123014 - 2014-10-07

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
the “incredibly horrendous damaging statement” because he read only the original PSI and, as his defense counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92653 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Reuben G. May
for the transcript. By May’s own statement in his motion for the transcript, he intends to use it to demonstrate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5828 - 2017-09-19

Philip J. Leach v. James Luterbach Construction Company, Inc.
there is a specific and express statement in the agreement to that effect. See Dykstra v. McKee & Co., 100 Wis.2d 120
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14996 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Senkbeil’s post-plea claims of confusion do not square with his failure to communicate it, his statements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124147 - 2017-09-21

Kay Ellen Webb-Macco v. Thomas William Macco
of his out-of-court statements as nothing more than failed efforts at marriage reconciliation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11840 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
recommendations in accordance with the plea agreement. Two victims gave statements, and Clavel-Hernandez
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=522537 - 2022-05-17

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of O’Brien’s current allegations are inconsistent with statements he made on the plea questionnaire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118090 - 2014-09-15

County of Calumet v. Dennis P. Ragen
. At the close of the hearing, the trial court made the following statement: [T]he proof here, Mr. Ragen, shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12780 - 2005-03-31