Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28131 - 28140 of 62323 for child support.
Search results 28131 - 28140 of 62323 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, and that the transport of Weinstein to the City-County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34265 - 2008-10-08
that the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, and that the transport of Weinstein to the City-County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34265 - 2008-10-08
Charles Schroeder v. Linda Wacker
. § 811.02. In support of his request, he executed an affidavit in which he stated, 4. I have personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
. § 811.02. In support of his request, he executed an affidavit in which he stated, 4. I have personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained during the investigatory traffic stop. She argues that the stop was not supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
obtained during the investigatory traffic stop. She argues that the stop was not supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
Thomas did not offer any evidence in support of his motion to suppress. Thomas argued that he reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
Thomas did not offer any evidence in support of his motion to suppress. Thomas argued that he reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
because it would have supported an inference that he used a portion of the undeposited fees to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35451 - 2009-02-04
because it would have supported an inference that he used a portion of the undeposited fees to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35451 - 2009-02-04
[PDF]
Nancy M. Keller v. Michael J. Keller, Sr.
and supporting allegations did not recite sufficient facts to warrant relief under §§ 806.07 or 767.325, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11564 - 2017-09-19
and supporting allegations did not recite sufficient facts to warrant relief under §§ 806.07 or 767.325, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
the trial court’s decision are not supported by the evidence and the decision reflects that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s decision are not supported by the evidence and the decision reflects that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Dean Medical Center v. Karri P. Hubanks
was the collection statement, and the collection statement was inadmissible hearsay. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13364 - 2017-09-21
was the collection statement, and the collection statement was inadmissible hearsay. In support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13364 - 2017-09-21
Nancy M. Keller v. Michael J. Keller, Sr.
of the custody issues. Based on that determination, the court further ruled that Nancy’s motion and supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11564 - 2005-03-31
of the custody issues. Based on that determination, the court further ruled that Nancy’s motion and supporting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11564 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the disciplinary decision and further claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51803 - 2010-07-07
also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the disciplinary decision and further claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51803 - 2010-07-07