Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28131 - 28140 of 62336 for child support.
Search results 28131 - 28140 of 62336 for child support.
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that there are sufficient facts contained in the complaints to support application of a hate crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33498 - 2008-07-23
contends that there are sufficient facts contained in the complaints to support application of a hate crime
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33498 - 2008-07-23
State v. Ronald C. Foust
to support guilt or enhance punishment for another offense. A defendant may not, in a subsequent proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
to support guilt or enhance punishment for another offense. A defendant may not, in a subsequent proceeding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12105 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
as insufficient to support the charges. On December 6, 2013, the parties appeared for a hearing on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149172 - 2017-09-21
as insufficient to support the charges. On December 6, 2013, the parties appeared for a hearing on the motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149172 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. O'Kray
presented a fair and just reason in support of his request. Second, O’Kray argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12175 - 2017-09-21
presented a fair and just reason in support of his request. Second, O’Kray argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12175 - 2017-09-21
Charles Schroeder v. Linda Wacker
. § 811.02. In support of his request, he executed an affidavit in which he stated, 4. I have personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
. § 811.02. In support of his request, he executed an affidavit in which he stated, 4. I have personal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2130 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
obtained during the investigatory traffic stop. She argues that the stop was not supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
obtained during the investigatory traffic stop. She argues that the stop was not supported by reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34029 - 2008-09-16
COURT OF APPEALS
Thomas did not offer any evidence in support of his motion to suppress. Thomas argued that he reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
Thomas did not offer any evidence in support of his motion to suppress. Thomas argued that he reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73304 - 2011-11-08
COURT OF APPEALS
because it would have supported an inference that he used a portion of the undeposited fees to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35451 - 2009-02-04
because it would have supported an inference that he used a portion of the undeposited fees to ensure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35451 - 2009-02-04
[PDF]
Nancy M. Keller v. Michael J. Keller, Sr.
and supporting allegations did not recite sufficient facts to warrant relief under §§ 806.07 or 767.325, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11564 - 2017-09-19
and supporting allegations did not recite sufficient facts to warrant relief under §§ 806.07 or 767.325, STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11564 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sally Ann Minniecheske
the trial court’s decision are not supported by the evidence and the decision reflects that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21
the trial court’s decision are not supported by the evidence and the decision reflects that discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12127 - 2017-09-21