Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28131 - 28140 of 46087 for paternity test paper work.

State v. Matthew T. Doughty
of the circumstances. Id., ¶38. This test requires balancing the personal characteristics of the defendant against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6617 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Francis E. Altman
prong of the Strickland test is satisfied where the attorney’s error is of such magnitude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26043 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
.” Lukens testified that after the stop but before they performed the field sobriety tests, they learned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41714 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. The motion alleged that the other acts were admissible under the test set forth in State v. Sullivan, 216
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250262 - 2019-11-14

[PDF] State v. Randolph S. Guenterberg
, 592, 267 N.W.2d 278, 282 (1978). The test is whether the consent to search was given in the absence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9030 - 2017-09-19

Marcia A. Klein v. Wisconsin Resource Center
regardless of their status as “requesters”; (2) the record custodian did not conduct a proper balancing test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12177 - 2005-03-31

State v. Richard D. Martin
, 446 U.S. 544, 554-55 (1980), a plurality opinion, the United States Supreme Court provided the test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3231 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Peggy L. Brennan v. Colleen A. Lampereur
). The appropriate test here for determining if the former occupants of the vehicle became mere pedestrians
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14752 - 2017-09-21

Lawrence E. Gilson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
was delivered, the Gilsons had a sample of the corn tested for moisture. They maintain that the test indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2581 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, Vessell seemingly overlooks that “[t]he evidentiary test on certiorari review is the substantial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184781 - 2017-09-21