Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28131 - 28140 of 58312 for speedy trial.
Search results 28131 - 28140 of 58312 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his breach-of-contract and relocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29256 - 2007-06-04
, appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing his breach-of-contract and relocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29256 - 2007-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
’ mother, who is grandmother to A.B. and C.B.’s younger siblings; (3) Burns’ trial attorney; and (4) one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62515 - 2011-04-06
’ mother, who is grandmother to A.B. and C.B.’s younger siblings; (3) Burns’ trial attorney; and (4) one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62515 - 2011-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff’s deputy Dan Semmerling testified at Busarow’s bench trial. 2 Semmerling explained he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144944 - 2017-09-21
sheriff’s deputy Dan Semmerling testified at Busarow’s bench trial. 2 Semmerling explained he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144944 - 2017-09-21
Louis J. Bricco v. Cavagna Group North America
Cavagna Group North America and Worthington Industries, Inc. The appellants argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12570 - 2005-03-31
Cavagna Group North America and Worthington Industries, Inc. The appellants argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12570 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mitchel L. Schanke
to perform a Terry1 stop; therefore, the stop was illegal and the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13749 - 2014-09-15
to perform a Terry1 stop; therefore, the stop was illegal and the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13749 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
is within the trial court’s discretion. We will uphold a trial court’s discretionary act if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32948 - 2014-09-15
is within the trial court’s discretion. We will uphold a trial court’s discretionary act if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32948 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the circuit court determined that Algrem Properties does not owe any sum to Smet Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90473 - 2012-12-12
trial, the circuit court determined that Algrem Properties does not owe any sum to Smet Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90473 - 2012-12-12
Hubert Hill v. Paul Zimmerman
that the trial court erred when it concluded: (1) the DOC record custodian was not required to grant Hill access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7964 - 2011-02-06
that the trial court erred when it concluded: (1) the DOC record custodian was not required to grant Hill access
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7964 - 2011-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff’s deputy Dan Semmerling testified at Busarow’s bench trial.[2] Semmerling explained he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144944 - 2015-07-27
sheriff’s deputy Dan Semmerling testified at Busarow’s bench trial.[2] Semmerling explained he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144944 - 2015-07-27
[PDF]
State v. Johnny Russo
was fourteen to sixteen years old at the time the incidents took place. At trial, the prosecution relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6281 - 2017-09-19
was fourteen to sixteen years old at the time the incidents took place. At trial, the prosecution relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6281 - 2017-09-19