Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28141 - 28150 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 28141 - 28150 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the same sentence.2 These contentions are nothing more than a claim that the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77975 - 2014-09-15
the same sentence.2 These contentions are nothing more than a claim that the sentencing court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77975 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Wisconsin and Florida entities, Decade among them. Each complaint sought enforcement of a claimed loan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89520 - 2014-09-15
Wisconsin and Florida entities, Decade among them. Each complaint sought enforcement of a claimed loan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89520 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
on grounds that he had filed a tort claim against Judge Grimm on June 23, 2008, just prior to the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40947 - 2014-09-15
on grounds that he had filed a tort claim against Judge Grimm on June 23, 2008, just prior to the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40947 - 2014-09-15
Leonard L. Jones v. Division Administrator
County Circuit Court, making two claims: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals lost jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8420 - 2005-03-31
County Circuit Court, making two claims: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals lost jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8420 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Martha Brock v. Milwaukee County Personnel Review Board
Brock’s claim for a temporary injunction, and restraining the PRB from proceeding with the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12007 - 2017-09-21
Brock’s claim for a temporary injunction, and restraining the PRB from proceeding with the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12007 - 2017-09-21
William F. Weaver v. Doug Drew
the Weavers' claims against American Family Mutual Insurance Company on the basis of a policy exclusion. Drew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10389 - 2005-03-31
the Weavers' claims against American Family Mutual Insurance Company on the basis of a policy exclusion. Drew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10389 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michelle Elizabeth Bernier v. M. Carey Bernier
of the separation check before taxes. We are therefore unable to further evaluate this claim, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3032 - 2017-09-19
of the separation check before taxes. We are therefore unable to further evaluate this claim, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3032 - 2017-09-19
State v. Raul M. Cordova
was unconstitutional because consent was not freely given. Supporting his motion, Cordova claimed that Feliberta did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
was unconstitutional because consent was not freely given. Supporting his motion, Cordova claimed that Feliberta did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
modification. He claimed, as relevant to this appeal, that: the court was “unaware” that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
modification. He claimed, as relevant to this appeal, that: the court was “unaware” that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134619 - 2015-02-09
State v. Jose G. Corpus
first address Corpus’s claim that he did not understand the plea proceeding because a Spanish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16
first address Corpus’s claim that he did not understand the plea proceeding because a Spanish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16