Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28141 - 28150 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 28141 - 28150 of 59255 for SMALL CLAIMS.
[PDF]
NOTICE
on grounds that he had filed a tort claim against Judge Grimm on June 23, 2008, just prior to the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40947 - 2014-09-15
on grounds that he had filed a tort claim against Judge Grimm on June 23, 2008, just prior to the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40947 - 2014-09-15
Leonard L. Jones v. Division Administrator
County Circuit Court, making two claims: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals lost jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8420 - 2005-03-31
County Circuit Court, making two claims: (1) the Division of Hearings and Appeals lost jurisdiction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8420 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michelle Elizabeth Bernier v. M. Carey Bernier
of the separation check before taxes. We are therefore unable to further evaluate this claim, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3032 - 2017-09-19
of the separation check before taxes. We are therefore unable to further evaluate this claim, and because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3032 - 2017-09-19
State v. Raul M. Cordova
was unconstitutional because consent was not freely given. Supporting his motion, Cordova claimed that Feliberta did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
was unconstitutional because consent was not freely given. Supporting his motion, Cordova claimed that Feliberta did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14185 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jose G. Corpus
first address Corpus’s claim that he did not understand the plea proceeding because a Spanish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16
first address Corpus’s claim that he did not understand the plea proceeding because a Spanish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19314 - 2005-08-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for plea withdrawal, claiming her pleas were not knowing, intelligent and voluntary because the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132233 - 2017-09-21
for plea withdrawal, claiming her pleas were not knowing, intelligent and voluntary because the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132233 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
an Alford plea, which was her right, but was skeptical of her claimed innocence, stating: “Her explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132813 - 2015-01-12
an Alford plea, which was her right, but was skeptical of her claimed innocence, stating: “Her explanation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132813 - 2015-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
. Scolman claims that the circuit court erred when it denied his postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
. Scolman claims that the circuit court erred when it denied his postconviction motion without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74805 - 2011-12-21
CA Blank Order
to a claim that the trial court erroneously excluded Richter’s statement. Another issue counsel raises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129501 - 2014-11-17
to a claim that the trial court erroneously excluded Richter’s statement. Another issue counsel raises
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=129501 - 2014-11-17
State v. Randy O. Bohardt
the record fails to support Bohardt's claims of error, we affirm. After a jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10111 - 2005-03-31
the record fails to support Bohardt's claims of error, we affirm. After a jury found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10111 - 2005-03-31