Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28151 - 28160 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 28151 - 28160 of 58492 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
trial, the circuit court determined that Algrem Properties does not owe any sum to Smet Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90473 - 2012-12-12
trial, the circuit court determined that Algrem Properties does not owe any sum to Smet Construction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90473 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
dispositional hearings. ¶4 Keri filed a postdisposition motion for a new trial, alleging she received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49276 - 2014-09-15
dispositional hearings. ¶4 Keri filed a postdisposition motion for a new trial, alleging she received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49276 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Post 2874 v. Redevelopment Authority
contends that the trial court erred when it concluded that: (1) Post 2874’s comparable-replacement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21367 - 2017-09-21
contends that the trial court erred when it concluded that: (1) Post 2874’s comparable-replacement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21367 - 2017-09-21
Mehran Heydarpour v. Stone Dimensions, Inc.
a new trial. However, we conclude the circuit court erroneously refused to consider Stone’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26176 - 2006-08-08
a new trial. However, we conclude the circuit court erroneously refused to consider Stone’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26176 - 2006-08-08
[PDF]
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
and Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
and Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15771 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
is within the trial court’s discretion. We will uphold a trial court’s discretionary act if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32948 - 2014-09-15
is within the trial court’s discretion. We will uphold a trial court’s discretionary act if the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32948 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Hubert Hill v. Paul Zimmerman
) and dismissing his petition for the writ. On appeal, Hill contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7964 - 2017-09-19
) and dismissing his petition for the writ. On appeal, Hill contends that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7964 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Mehran Heydarpour v. Stone Dimensions, Inc.
trial. However, we conclude the circuit court erroneously refused to consider Stone’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26176 - 2017-09-21
trial. However, we conclude the circuit court erroneously refused to consider Stone’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26176 - 2017-09-21
State v. Johnny Russo
at the time the incidents took place. At trial, the prosecution relied primarily on the victim’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6281 - 2005-03-31
at the time the incidents took place. At trial, the prosecution relied primarily on the victim’s testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6281 - 2005-03-31
Clara M. Rolland v. County of Milwaukee
and Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31
and Milwaukee Transport Services, Inc., appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15771 - 2005-03-31