Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28161 - 28170 of 29967 for de.

[PDF] Michael J. Thorson v. David H. Schwarz
application is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Tuescher, 226 Wis. 2d 465, 468, 595 N.W
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16706 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI App 64
without filing a new action. No. 2019AP1206 15 do not engage in that sort of familiar de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=287609 - 2021-01-12

State v. Ryan J. Frayer
that we review de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2520 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and administrative regulations to undisputed facts, which ordinarily is a question of law subject to de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105813 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Fran Ingebritson v. The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Madison
is a question of law which we review de novo. Watts v. Watts, 137 Wis.2d 506, 512, 405 N.W.2d 303, 306 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9324 - 2017-09-19

State v. James R. Thiel
, in applying those facts to the constitutional standard for ineffective assistance, we determine de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4071 - 2005-03-31

Nancy Megal v. Green Bay Area Visitor & Convention Bureau, Inc.
courts review de novo, State v. Williams, 104 Wis. 2d 15, 21-22, 310 N.W.2d 601 (1981), the supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5841 - 2005-03-31

Charles Treuber v. Newman Machine Company, Inc.
of a matter to the jury is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14955 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. Olson v. Town of Cottage Grove, 2008 WI 51, ¶32, 309 Wis. 2d 365, 749 N.W.2d 211
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96809 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Melvin S. Lewis
we decide de novo. See State v. Sauceda, 168 Wis. 2d 486, 492, 485 N.W.2d 1 (1992). ¶39
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2389 - 2017-09-19