Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28161 - 28170 of 65155 for or b.
Search results 28161 - 28170 of 65155 for or b.
State v. Anthony W. Quattrochi
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The judgment and order were appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
. This opinion will not be published. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] The judgment and order were appealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13271 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. In the section below, I address his remaining arguments. B. Little’s Remaining Arguments ¶14 Little argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77156 - 2014-09-15
. In the section below, I address his remaining arguments. B. Little’s Remaining Arguments ¶14 Little argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77156 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. April O.
of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. See Jason B. v. State, 176 Wis. 2d 400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16018 - 2017-09-21
of this case, presents a legal question of statutory interpretation. See Jason B. v. State, 176 Wis. 2d 400
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16018 - 2017-09-21
State v. Brady T. Terrill
the circuit court accepts a plea agreement, not after. As the holding in Comstock states: [B]efore accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2902 - 2005-03-31
the circuit court accepts a plea agreement, not after. As the holding in Comstock states: [B]efore accepting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2902 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sandra W.
better for the dispositional hearing would not have altered the outcome of this case. B. Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3286 - 2005-03-31
better for the dispositional hearing would not have altered the outcome of this case. B. Withdrawal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3286 - 2005-03-31
CVW v. Lawrence M. Stress
… a deed of the real property[.]” 26 U.S.C. § 6338(b). Consequently, and with respect to junior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15062 - 2005-03-31
… a deed of the real property[.]” 26 U.S.C. § 6338(b). Consequently, and with respect to junior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15062 - 2005-03-31
Janice Howe v. Ronald Howe
under the property division. (b) Second, to respondent’s share of current health insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4328 - 2005-03-31
under the property division. (b) Second, to respondent’s share of current health insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4328 - 2005-03-31
Steven M. Lucareli v. Vilas County
, used or continued in bad faith, solely for purposes of harassing or maliciously injuring another. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
, used or continued in bad faith, solely for purposes of harassing or maliciously injuring another. (b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13746 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(TILA), and relied on an index for determining the interest rate that violated Wis. Stat. § 138.056(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
(TILA), and relied on an index for determining the interest rate that violated Wis. Stat. § 138.056(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36687 - 2009-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Christopher E. Betow
.” The argument, in the State’s words, is that [b]ecause some people signal[] their use of drugs by displaying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14443 - 2017-09-21
.” The argument, in the State’s words, is that [b]ecause some people signal[] their use of drugs by displaying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14443 - 2017-09-21