Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28161 - 28170 of 63215 for records.
Search results 28161 - 28170 of 63215 for records.
Duane P. Reusch v. Mark W. Roob
-claims court record as a “court trial,” to determine what pecuniary loss, if any, the Reusches had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3409 - 2005-03-31
-claims court record as a “court trial,” to determine what pecuniary loss, if any, the Reusches had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3409 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Winnebago County v. Travis G. Lankford
court’s discretionary ruling if the record shows that the court, in fact, exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19
court’s discretionary ruling if the record shows that the court, in fact, exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7557 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106983 - 2017-09-21
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106983 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
basis for the pleas, and the court found that the record supported the crimes charged. ¶3 In July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32255 - 2014-09-15
basis for the pleas, and the court found that the record supported the crimes charged. ¶3 In July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32255 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Willard Leaf v. Village of Lake Nebagamon
on the record regarding the reason for its ruling, but it did not consider Hendrick to be a surprise witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7413 - 2017-09-20
on the record regarding the reason for its ruling, but it did not consider Hendrick to be a surprise witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7413 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
review is limited to considering whether the record created before the committee shows that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35114 - 2014-09-15
review is limited to considering whether the record created before the committee shows that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35114 - 2014-09-15
State v. Robert D. Bates
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7350 - 2005-03-31
, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7350 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kyle W.F.
at the fact-finding hearing to be acknowledging that was an error. [3] There is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
at the fact-finding hearing to be acknowledging that was an error. [3] There is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1981). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116156 - 2017-09-21
(1981). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kathryn R. Fleming v. Dean P. Fleming
that the record shows he did contribute significantly. This argument does not undercut the court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26592 - 2017-09-21
that the record shows he did contribute significantly. This argument does not undercut the court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26592 - 2017-09-21