Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28171 - 28180 of 29817 for des.

[PDF]
. § 802.08(2). ¶23 I review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729518 - 2023-11-16

[PDF] Frontsheet
Preemption presents a question of law we review de novo. Partenfelder v. Rhode, 2014 WI 80, ¶25, 356 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265793 - 2020-06-26

Charles Treuber v. Newman Machine Company, Inc.
of a matter to the jury is a question of law subject to de novo review. See Zintek v. Perchik, 163 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14955 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
as found by the circuit court is a question of law we review de novo. Steele v. Pacesetter Motor Cars, Inc
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83172 - 2012-05-30

[PDF] State v. Hydrite Chemical Company
a question of statutory construction, which we review de novo. If the trial court made an error of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11003 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16762 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Donna Kurer v. Parke
). Although we value a circuit court’s analysis, our review of its grant or denial of summary judgment is de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6250 - 2017-09-19

State v. Robert K. Rymer
alleges facts which, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15624 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, and is a matter of law we review de novo. State v. Green, 2002 WI 68, ¶¶20, 34, 253 Wis. 2d 356, 646 N.W.2d 298
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=455859 - 2021-11-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382251 - 2021-06-29