Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28171 - 28180 of 29713 for des.
Search results 28171 - 28180 of 29713 for des.
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Response of Petitioners to Hunter Intervenors Motion for Relief from Judgment (01-29-24)
PERKINS AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924hunterresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30
PERKINS AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_012924hunterresponse.pdf - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - October 2014
County Circuit Court decision, Judge John A. Des Jardins, presiding. 2013AP578 State v. Knipfer
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122327 - 2014-09-22
County Circuit Court decision, Judge John A. Des Jardins, presiding. 2013AP578 State v. Knipfer
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122327 - 2014-09-22
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - January 2017
the committee’s “adopti[on] of 37 conditions of approval was a de jure approval of the [permit]” under
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181614 - 2017-09-21
the committee’s “adopti[on] of 37 conditions of approval was a de jure approval of the [permit]” under
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181614 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
2021AP001450 - Response of Citizen Mathematicians and Scientists to Motion to Recuse Justice Protasiewicz
PERKINS, AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020724response.pdf - 2024-02-07
PERKINS, AND RONALD ZAHN, Petitioners, BLACK LEADERS ORGANIZING FOR COMMUNITIES, VOCES DE LA FRONTERA
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1450_020724response.pdf - 2024-02-07
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
of counsel, the court of appeals must defer to the postconviction court’s fact-findings but reviews de novo
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197564 - 2017-10-05
of counsel, the court of appeals must defer to the postconviction court’s fact-findings but reviews de novo
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197564 - 2017-10-05
[PDF]
State v. Gary Lewis Petty
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16870 - 2017-09-21
. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16870 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶21 To demonstrate that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27
ineffective assistance is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶21 To demonstrate that trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919206 - 2025-02-27
[PDF]
. § 802.08(2). ¶23 I review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729518 - 2023-11-16
. § 802.08(2). ¶23 I review a circuit court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, “applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729518 - 2023-11-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382251 - 2021-06-29
, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Bentley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=382251 - 2021-06-29
State v. Kevin Gilmore
is an issue of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16893 - 2005-03-31
is an issue of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16893 - 2005-03-31