Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28181 - 28190 of 62778 for child support.
Search results 28181 - 28190 of 62778 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Gary R. Malkmus
consecutive sentences. There is no evidence to support Malkmus’s claim that he deserves sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26332 - 2017-09-21
consecutive sentences. There is no evidence to support Malkmus’s claim that he deserves sentence credit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26332 - 2017-09-21
State of Wisconsin ex. rel. Bryce Garrett v. Gerald Berge
was sufficient to support the guilty findings. We affirm. ¶2 On June 20, 2002, the security director
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
was sufficient to support the guilty findings. We affirm. ¶2 On June 20, 2002, the security director
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6488 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
prior to his disciplinary hearing; (3) that there was insufficient evidence to support the disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34248 - 2008-10-08
prior to his disciplinary hearing; (3) that there was insufficient evidence to support the disciplinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34248 - 2008-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdicts. We disagree and affirm the judgment of conviction. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32338 - 2008-04-07
that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdicts. We disagree and affirm the judgment of conviction. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32338 - 2008-04-07
Wendy Lee Miland v. Russell Atter
with the $50,000 payment. Rather, they support DTCDD's argument that the $50,000 represents consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10376 - 2005-03-31
with the $50,000 payment. Rather, they support DTCDD's argument that the $50,000 represents consideration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10376 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to support the jury’s findings on the weapons-related charges. We disagree and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34160 - 2008-09-29
to support the jury’s findings on the weapons-related charges. We disagree and affirm the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34160 - 2008-09-29
City of Menasha v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
in support of the proposition that it is entitled to unilaterally withdraw from this portion of the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8367 - 2005-03-31
in support of the proposition that it is entitled to unilaterally withdraw from this portion of the agreement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8367 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
) that there was insufficient evidence to support the disciplinary decision because the confidential informants’ statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34248 - 2014-09-15
) that there was insufficient evidence to support the disciplinary decision because the confidential informants’ statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34248 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
exercised its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence as the court relied on factors not supported
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205742 - 2017-12-20
exercised its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence as the court relied on factors not supported
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205742 - 2017-12-20
George W. Schmidt v. Linda L. Schmidt
in the record to support the trial court's determination to reopen the judgment. Although the settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10839 - 2005-03-31
in the record to support the trial court's determination to reopen the judgment. Although the settlement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10839 - 2005-03-31