Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28191 - 28200 of 59699 for quit claim deed/1000.

State v. Jeffrey L. Neuman
of time removed, the State contends that Neuman has an undisputed claim to only eight days of credit: one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4239 - 2005-03-31

State v. Brian K. Schessler
had discovered new evidence in support of his claim that he was denied the effective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25828 - 2006-08-29

[PDF] State Engineering Association v. Employe Trust Funds Board
immunity. The trial court ordered payment of plaintiffs' attorney fees. Defendants appeal, claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7803 - 2017-09-19

State Engineering Association v. Employe Trust Funds Board
appeal, claiming that the legislation is constitutional; that sovereign immunity bars all monetary relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7803 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Citation to Unpublished Opinions Committee Interim Report
of counsel. In response to Judge Brunner's prediction that ineffective assistance claims would increase
/publications/reports/docs/unpublishedopinions.pdf - 2012-04-25

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the State’s alleged vouching—this failure is the basis of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=594754 - 2022-11-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and the postconviction order denying him a new trial. He claims that No. 2013AP1100-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132817 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
surcharges under WIS. STAT. § 973.046(1r). Id., ¶12. Accordingly, Cloyd’s remaining claim was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=580765 - 2022-10-25

[PDF] Dora O. Alvarado and Lenny Gonzales v. Peter Sersch
sued Meriter and Oakbrook claiming, among other things, common law negligence. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4116 - 2017-09-20

2010 WI APP 22
in Bray’s favor. Bray contends that the trial court erred in excluding some of his claimed damages from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44187 - 2010-02-23