Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28191 - 28200 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 28191 - 28200 of 83258 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
of service for all civil cases where, as here, the parties were registered users of the electronic filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395932 - 2021-07-22
of service for all civil cases where, as here, the parties were registered users of the electronic filing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=395932 - 2021-07-22
Arthur Robert Petrie v. Board of Bar Examiners
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-2414-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17297 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-2414-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
as witnesses in OWI cases. As noted, the letter lobbied for adoption of a local rule which would permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
as witnesses in OWI cases. As noted, the letter lobbied for adoption of a local rule which would permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107363 - 2014-01-22
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21. After our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107363 - 2014-01-22
[PDF]
Town of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha
court decided the case on summary judgment and concluded that there were no material factual issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4589 - 2017-09-19
court decided the case on summary judgment and concluded that there were no material factual issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4589 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1) (2011-12),[1] to compel settlement of the case on Northland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93778 - 2013-03-06
court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1) (2011-12),[1] to compel settlement of the case on Northland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93778 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1) to notify him of the State’s pretrial offer1 and (2) to properly investigate the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92944 - 2014-09-15
(1) to notify him of the State’s pretrial offer1 and (2) to properly investigate the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92944 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
consider them.” Id. at 46. ¶8 Nonetheless, in an appropriate case, we will address a forfeited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74188 - 2011-11-21
consider them.” Id. at 46. ¶8 Nonetheless, in an appropriate case, we will address a forfeited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74188 - 2011-11-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709303 - 2023-10-05
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=709303 - 2023-10-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224007 - 2018-10-30
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=224007 - 2018-10-30