Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2821 - 2830 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 2821 - 2830 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
NOTICE
is not frivolous. We affirm the judgment and the denial of costs and attorneys fees for a frivolous action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48076 - 2014-09-15
is not frivolous. We affirm the judgment and the denial of costs and attorneys fees for a frivolous action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48076 - 2014-09-15
Frontsheet
); and that he be required to pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $4,960.72 as of June 1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56321 - 2010-11-02
); and that he be required to pay the costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which were $4,960.72 as of June 1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56321 - 2010-11-02
[PDF]
Frontsheet
as set forth herein, and order Attorney Bryant to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which total
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133827 - 2017-09-21
as set forth herein, and order Attorney Bryant to pay the full costs of this proceeding, which total
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133827 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gaylene Schwalen v. James E. Howey
$10,000 more a year to take care of.” Gaylene replied “Court costs have been court costs. If you want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2669 - 2017-09-19
$10,000 more a year to take care of.” Gaylene replied “Court costs have been court costs. If you want
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2669 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
frivolous costs and fees. In Parkland Plaza Veterinary Clinic, S.C. v. Anne Gerard (Parkland II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44371 - 2014-09-15
frivolous costs and fees. In Parkland Plaza Veterinary Clinic, S.C. v. Anne Gerard (Parkland II
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44371 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert Donald Lewerenz v. Jane Carol Lewerenz
improperly disregarded Jane’s testimony regarding her anticipated post-divorce costs for health insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12749 - 2017-09-21
improperly disregarded Jane’s testimony regarding her anticipated post-divorce costs for health insurance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12749 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 81
counseling, provided no testimony or other evidence of any counseling costs, and indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175376 - 2017-09-21
counseling, provided no testimony or other evidence of any counseling costs, and indicated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175376 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI 45
be revoked and that he pay restitution, along with the costs of this proceeding, following his default
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50736 - 2014-09-15
be revoked and that he pay restitution, along with the costs of this proceeding, following his default
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50736 - 2014-09-15
Jane Fulton v. Raymond R. Vogt
should have granted his request for security for costs pursuant to §§ 814.27-28, Stats. We reject each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11090 - 2005-03-31
should have granted his request for security for costs pursuant to §§ 814.27-28, Stats. We reject each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11090 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Gabriel L. Ortiz
the restitution order. The judgment directs Ortiz to reimburse the city of Racine for overtime costs incurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19
the restitution order. The judgment directs Ortiz to reimburse the city of Racine for overtime costs incurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3391 - 2017-09-19